[identity profile] inkarn8.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] davis_square
Does anyone know why the City would ticket Somerville's own residents for expired inspection stickers? -- Two tickets 3 days apart? If I owned a driveway, they would not have done this... Can't they stick to the spirit of protecting our residential parking spots from outsiders? How about a warning instead, or a friendly reminder? And then a few days to get a sticker...

And why do they ticket cars after the street cleaner has already passed? I don't get any of those tickets for that reason, but it seems silly to not be able to park after the cleaner has clearly already passed... Is anyone else interested in getting some of these unfriendly policies changed? Also, why do we pay an extra Internet fee to pay tickets and update parking passes for a service which clearly must save the city time and money from waiting on us in person? How does the city award the contract to an Internet company which is making so much money for so little service?

Does anyone have a list of local politicians that support these policies and another list of who would rather see changes made?

Thanks so much!

Re: Re: *sigh*

Date: 2014-09-10 12:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
Except that in this case, it actually IS fair that you were ticketed, but you seem to be unable to accept that.

Date: 2014-09-10 05:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aerynne.livejournal.com
I don't see what renting has to do with any of this. You have an entire month to get a new sticker. More, since you can get your car re-inspected early. I've certainly failed to get my inspection done before it expired in the past, but that was my problem.

You seem to feel that this policy is unfair because the way the law is enforced changed three years ago. The change was enacted through our city's democratic process and residents had the opportunity to attend the budget meetings and call their aldermen. In fact, you still do, if you'd like to advocate for another change. That's how this works. The money the city receives from these fines is going towards running the city-absolutely beneficial for all residents.

RE: Re: Re: *sigh*

Date: 2014-09-10 08:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] craigindaville.livejournal.com
Do YOU believe this a good policy? Would you be apposed to changing to something similar to what Texas has: And if so why or why not? ... Calling me a whinner, whether I am or not, is not productive..

Yes. As stated before, but you just don't like the answer, it encourages drivers to get their inspections done, which in turn helps ensure that cars driving in MA meet minimum safety and emissions standards. It is good policy. Period.

As also stated, creating a system where municipalities have to set up either written warning systems or appeals processes just for dealing with this would be a burden, and in the end wouldn't save the resident much money and would certainly waste time. Your beloved Texas still charges $20 just to appeal the ticket, and there would likely be an in-person requirement for waiving it which is time both of city resources and the resident's availability during business hours.

In my opinion, and the opinion of many on this forum, and the opinion of the Board of Aldermen, this is a silly use of resources for a straightforward fine that both encourages people to follow existing law and helps fund the city services that all residents and visitors to Somerville take advantage of.

Profile

davis_square: (Default)
The Davis Square Community

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 11th, 2025 04:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios