![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Does anyone know why the City would ticket Somerville's own residents for expired inspection stickers? -- Two tickets 3 days apart? If I owned a driveway, they would not have done this... Can't they stick to the spirit of protecting our residential parking spots from outsiders? How about a warning instead, or a friendly reminder? And then a few days to get a sticker...
And why do they ticket cars after the street cleaner has already passed? I don't get any of those tickets for that reason, but it seems silly to not be able to park after the cleaner has clearly already passed... Is anyone else interested in getting some of these unfriendly policies changed? Also, why do we pay an extra Internet fee to pay tickets and update parking passes for a service which clearly must save the city time and money from waiting on us in person? How does the city award the contract to an Internet company which is making so much money for so little service?
Does anyone have a list of local politicians that support these policies and another list of who would rather see changes made?
Thanks so much!
And why do they ticket cars after the street cleaner has already passed? I don't get any of those tickets for that reason, but it seems silly to not be able to park after the cleaner has clearly already passed... Is anyone else interested in getting some of these unfriendly policies changed? Also, why do we pay an extra Internet fee to pay tickets and update parking passes for a service which clearly must save the city time and money from waiting on us in person? How does the city award the contract to an Internet company which is making so much money for so little service?
Does anyone have a list of local politicians that support these policies and another list of who would rather see changes made?
Thanks so much!
RE: Re: *sigh*
Date: 2014-09-10 12:41 pm (UTC)Re: Re: *sigh*
Date: 2014-09-10 12:49 pm (UTC)RE: Re: Re: *sigh*
Date: 2014-09-10 01:14 pm (UTC)Do YOU believe this a good policy? Would you be apposed to changing to something similar to what Texas has: And if so why or why not? ... Calling me a whinner, whether I am or not, is not productive..
'Texas law (until March 2015 when the law will change) allows you to obtain an Administrative Dismissal of an Expired Inspection ticket if the following terms are met:
1) The Expired Inspection is remedied within 20 working days;
2) The Inspection Sticker was NOT expired for more than 60 days at the time of the ticket; and
3) You pay the $20 Administrative Dismissal Fee
edit, changed it from Texas registration policy to Texas Inspection policy...
no subject
Date: 2014-09-10 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-09-10 08:41 pm (UTC)That is really good advice about informing your Alderman and letting them know what you think. Thanks.
RE: Re: Re: *sigh*
Date: 2014-09-10 08:52 pm (UTC)Yes. As stated before, but you just don't like the answer, it encourages drivers to get their inspections done, which in turn helps ensure that cars driving in MA meet minimum safety and emissions standards. It is good policy. Period.
As also stated, creating a system where municipalities have to set up either written warning systems or appeals processes just for dealing with this would be a burden, and in the end wouldn't save the resident much money and would certainly waste time. Your beloved Texas still charges $20 just to appeal the ticket, and there would likely be an in-person requirement for waiving it which is time both of city resources and the resident's availability during business hours.
In my opinion, and the opinion of many on this forum, and the opinion of the Board of Aldermen, this is a silly use of resources for a straightforward fine that both encourages people to follow existing law and helps fund the city services that all residents and visitors to Somerville take advantage of.