Date: 2016-04-07 03:48 pm (UTC)
yes, to be sure, i meant the reason we can't have nice things in this case is the building owner, not the city. i do think the city should be paid for the extra services they provided that were directly related to the building not being properly maintained, and then taking much longer than expected to repair. Someone should pay for it, and i think the building owner should be that person. Given that the building owner hasn't been motivated to do much so far, i'm not hopeful that he will do it, though.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

davis_square: (Default)
The Davis Square Community

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 20th, 2025 06:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios