yes, to be sure, i meant the reason we can't have nice things in this case is the building owner, not the city. i do think the city should be paid for the extra services they provided that were directly related to the building not being properly maintained, and then taking much longer than expected to repair. Someone should pay for it, and i think the building owner should be that person. Given that the building owner hasn't been motivated to do much so far, i'm not hopeful that he will do it, though.
no subject
Date: 2016-04-07 03:48 pm (UTC)