There are several stories in this discussion about people who let their dogs run free in places where those pets run in front of moving bikes etc. This endangers both the pet and the people around them. Not a leap at all, simply a reference to the subject of this discussion. Having unleashed dogs on the bike path endangers both the dogs and the other people on the path.
As for who gets to decide what's irresponsible: there are laws in place that define this. I am simply calling for those laws to be enforced.
Turns out that owning a dog without a license results in hefty fines, not euthanasia. Mentioning euthanasia was alarmist and unfair.
As for moving away: I never advocated making people move away. I advocated tickets and license revocations, in that order. You leapt right to the revocations, and started this whole discussion of forcing people out of their homes, which was also alarmist and unfair.
I never suggested that people should be forced to move away. However, if people really feel that their dog needs more free-roaming space than is available where they live, and they really DO love the dog as much as they SAY they love the dog, they should move away by choice, to provide for the basic needs of their loved one. Alternately, they could find a nice home for their loved one, with a family that can provide for its basic needs.
Instead, people simply ignore the safety regulations that call for leashing their dog, which puts the dog into situations where it can be injured or killed, situations that also endanger other people. That doesn't sound like love to me.
no subject
As for who gets to decide what's irresponsible: there are laws in place that define this. I am simply calling for those laws to be enforced.
Turns out that owning a dog without a license results in hefty fines, not euthanasia. Mentioning euthanasia was alarmist and unfair.
As for moving away: I never advocated making people move away. I advocated tickets and license revocations, in that order. You leapt right to the revocations, and started this whole discussion of forcing people out of their homes, which was also alarmist and unfair.
I never suggested that people should be forced to move away. However, if people really feel that their dog needs more free-roaming space than is available where they live, and they really DO love the dog as much as they SAY they love the dog, they should move away by choice, to provide for the basic needs of their loved one. Alternately, they could find a nice home for their loved one, with a family that can provide for its basic needs.
Instead, people simply ignore the safety regulations that call for leashing their dog, which puts the dog into situations where it can be injured or killed, situations that also endanger other people. That doesn't sound like love to me.