Clearly the children in the article were out of line. Equally clearly the children in the article are the reason the policy has been made of furor of. The reason I didn't know about the policy for the last 18 months is that nobody has made said furor any earlier, and I don't have children myself.

That being said, now that I know about it? I completely disapprove -- not of the events described in the paper, in which it seems like the theater was completely within its rights, but of the policy itself. I find it discriminatory.