Ron Newman (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
ron_newman) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
davis_square2008-09-24 04:20 pm
ron_newman) wrote in davis_square2008-09-24 04:20 pm
Entry tags:
Somerville rocks, so why does our Mayor oppose Question 2?
Somerville has a well-deserved image of being a haven for offbeat and creative types, so I'm confused and disappointed to see Mayor Joe take part in a press conference opposing Question 2.
As the city's press release itself points out, "Question 2 would decriminalize marijuana use and make possession of small amounts of marijuana punishable only with a fine similar to a traffic violation." (Actually, the police can also seize the marijuana.) That seems to me like just plain common sense. It saves the city money by not wasting police and court time on prosecuting a victimless "crime".
The campaigners against Question 2 call themselves the "Coalition for Safe Streets", but this question has nothing to do with either safety or streets.
Why did you do this, Mayor Joe?
As the city's press release itself points out, "Question 2 would decriminalize marijuana use and make possession of small amounts of marijuana punishable only with a fine similar to a traffic violation." (Actually, the police can also seize the marijuana.) That seems to me like just plain common sense. It saves the city money by not wasting police and court time on prosecuting a victimless "crime".
The campaigners against Question 2 call themselves the "Coalition for Safe Streets", but this question has nothing to do with either safety or streets.
Why did you do this, Mayor Joe?
no subject
can't speak to gateways or other antics. people do what they do, and you can only blame their parents and society; see: south park the movie.
let it be known: kissing WHILE fucking can lead to pregnancy!
and the father of that child... nice!
#