http://nvidia99999.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] nvidia99999.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] davis_square2009-10-28 11:25 am
Entry tags:

Boston Area Coalition of Reason Kick Off Event (Nov 2)

Good without God? Millions of Americans are.
boston.unitedcor.org/

Kickoff Event

When: Monday Nov.2, 7:30-9:30 PM
Where: Harvard Science Center Hall D. Free and Open to the Public

I thought this could be of interest. One of the member organizations is the Tufts Free Thought Society. www.facebook.com/group.php


[identity profile] arcanology.livejournal.com 2009-10-28 07:25 pm (UTC)(link)
So "flight without feathers" is antagonistic to feathers?

I don't think of bats as so confrontational.

[identity profile] turil.livejournal.com 2009-10-28 07:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Linguistically, yes. The way the brain works, in the instance of negation of something, is to first imagine (remember~reconstruct) what that something is, and then imagine it disappearing. So in the brain, most people would imagine feathers on something that is flying - "Hey!" the brain says, "I know this one! A bird!" - and then removes the feathers from the image, leaving a very pathetic looking naked and uncomfortable bird flying around in their mind's eye. After a while the higher functions of the brain take a look at that image and compare it to the context of what you were talking about around that bizarre phrase, and decides if you might actually mean something quite different from that unpleasant bird. But even with this correction, the first impression, which is the strongest emotionally, is of something "wrong".