"But it sounds like you want to discriminate against certain individuals..."
That's a bald faced lie. That assertion is not supported by anything I wrote and I think you know it.
I found you perplexing before. Now I understand your main problem.
You have NO clue how elections actually work and are unable to distinguish between government employees who are hired by elected officials and the officials themselves. You're also incapable of thinking though the results of the ideas you've been floating. You have a cute idea, but lack the will or capacity to think it through to the end.
The nullification I spoke of was just one consequence we would see if special voters were allocated to "vote" on behalf of large groups of animals and plants, as you seem to be advocating. I don't think you even understand what you're trying to propose. You just have a vague notion that "someone" is being left out of the voting process, but are unable to articulate anything more specific than "birds" and "aliens."
Re: Who said anything about "nullifying" anything?
That's a bald faced lie. That assertion is not supported by anything I wrote and I think you know it.
I found you perplexing before. Now I understand your main problem.
You have NO clue how elections actually work and are unable to distinguish between government employees who are hired by elected officials and the officials themselves. You're also incapable of thinking though the results of the ideas you've been floating. You have a cute idea, but lack the will or capacity to think it through to the end.
The nullification I spoke of was just one consequence we would see if special voters were allocated to "vote" on behalf of large groups of animals and plants, as you seem to be advocating. I don't think you even understand what you're trying to propose. You just have a vague notion that "someone" is being left out of the voting process, but are unable to articulate anything more specific than "birds" and "aliens."