http://keithn.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] keithn.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] davis_square 2014-11-06 07:20 pm (UTC)

When you reported "they didn't seem so happy with the proposed Crunch Gym on the second floor" I took that to mean that they were... well... unhappy with the Crunch Gym proposal, for the reasons you listed (traffic reasons). If they were OK with it, they would just issue a variance, as you just indicated. Could you clarify your original comments, because I feel like I'm not interpreting your words the way you meant.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting