![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Please don't vote for the xenophobe Charlie Chisholm for Ward 6 Alderman
In this thread, I stated that I personally recalled Charlie Chisholm running racist and anti-immigrant campaigns against then-Ward 6 Alderman Jack Connolly in the early 1990s. At that time, Somerville's "Sanctuary City" resolution welcoming immigrants was a major political issue. People have (understandably) challenged me for hard evidence, so I spent a few hours today at the Somerville Central Library looking over Somerville Journal microfilm from 1991 and 1993. Here's what I found:
from editorial "Hitting a new low on the campaign trail", 11/7/91:
In Ward Six, Charlie Chisholm issued a pamphlet proclaiming "Somerville: It used to be your city; now, it's Jack Connolly's 'Sanctuary City'" interspersed with photographs of houses with "For Sale" signs.
from election coverage on 11/7/91:
Chisholm apparently gained a lot of ground between preliminary day and the final election by linking Connolly to the so-called "Sanctuary City" resolution and saying the resolution was responsible for drawing immigrants that pushed long-time residents out of the city.
from "New face in midst of Ward Six rematch", 9/2/93:
"I don't see myself as anti-immigrant", says Chisholm. "What is wrong is when we have all sorts of unrestricted illegal immigrants coming in here."
Many of those illegal aliens were drawn to Somerville because of the host of service agencies here, says Chisholm. And the city has borne too heavy a burden for its welcoming attitude in areas like education and housing, he argues.
Charles Chisholm answers questions from the Journal, 9/23/93:
... the "Sanctuary City" substitute "City of Hope" resolution, which was sponsored by Alderman Jack Connolly, should be repealed and those groups and agencies which encourage illegals to settle in Somerville should desist from targeting Somerville for a further increase in population. We cannot afford a further influx of illegal aliens. Already, plans are being developed by the School Department's Somerville 2000 Committee to meet the necessity of forced cross city busing to accommodate Chapter 636 of M.G.L. This law requires "racially imbalanced" schools to be integrated. Finally, we should support the passage of a law to report illegals for deportation who have committed crimes. It must be clear that Somerville will not tolerate becoming another crime infested Massachusetts city. Also, the movement to have illegals vote in city elections, which has begun in Cambridge, makes a mockery of citizenship and should be opposed.
In 1993, some people in Somerville circulated a local initiative petition to place repeal of the Sanctuary City resolution onto that year's general election ballot. The city's Election Commission disqualified the petition after finding that many of the signatures on it were forged and faked. The Journal's article on 10/7/93 said:
One signature that was valid was that of Charles Chisholm, a candidate for alderman in Ward Sox who signed the petition on a separate sheet of paper.
I can't support someone who chose to divide the community this way when campaigning for political office. Yes, these campaigns were 22 and 24 years ago --- but in his current campaign, he's claiming that his one term on the Board of Alderman 38-40 years ago (the last time he held public office) is relevant experience.
When you vote this Thursday, please choose one of the other three fine candidates for Ward 6 Alderman: Lance Davis, David Lieberman, or Elizabeth Weinbloom. Thank you for listening.
EDIT 9/16 8 pm: Just to make things completely clear: In this post I'm speaking solely for myself as a Ward 6 resident and voter, NOT as a co-moderator of Davis Square LiveJournal.
no subject
He did? Then why did he tell the Somerville Journal otherwise?
- He just thought Cambridge was in a better position to accommodate
Cambridge was and is also a sanctuary city. There's no reason we can't have more than one.
- You are probably the same person who is spreading the homophobic idea that Charles is a pedophile
No, I've never even heard this allegation before you brought it up here.
- You're probably part of the same crowd that tore down Charles' literature and replaced it with Davis'
I've never heard of this happening. When and where? (By the way, I'm not necessarily a Davis supporter. I'm still deciding.)
- You're the same type of naysayer that told me that "There can never be an LGBT center at Bryant University"
I know nothing about Bryant University, but I've supported LGBT rights consistently for many years.
- But if any of you want to hear the true story about Charles' background and stance on sanctuary cities, feel free to email me
Or you (or Charles) could post it here as a comment, or as a new post in DSLJ. That way everyone can read it.
- a Live Journal like this that is run by a biased person like Ron Newman.
This community has four moderators; I'm just one of them. This post speaks only for me, not necessarily for any of the other three moderators, and certainly not for any other participants in this LiveJournal. This is a free and open platform that anyone can participate in. I have not deleted anyone's post or comment on this campaign, nor do I intend to.