I guess my confusion is that in either result, the City still needs about $130m to repair the building. Is that accounted for in the general budget, now? If not, what is the City's recourse? I guess I'm missing that part of the narrative.
Still leaning on voting Yes (strongly), but as said, just looking to get perspective from both sides.
no subject
I guess my confusion is that in either result, the City still needs about $130m to repair the building. Is that accounted for in the general budget, now? If not, what is the City's recourse? I guess I'm missing that part of the narrative.
Still leaning on voting Yes (strongly), but as said, just looking to get perspective from both sides.