ext_357886 ([identity profile] androidqueen.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] davis_square 2007-02-22 08:16 pm (UTC)

i am far too lazy to do any research, but as i recall, the sidewalks are kind of public, kind of private. so, for example, a business can declare no loitering or no smoking, but i don't think they're allowed to remove the sidewalk entirely.

as [livejournal.com profile] ayelle put it, someone has to do it, and someone has to pay for it. personally, i think the city is porbably saving taxpayers money and avoiding corruption by having homeowners do it themselves rather than hiring a company to do the city

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting