ext_382918 (![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
redcolumbine.livejournal.com) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
davis_square2008-07-10 09:51 pm
redcolumbine.livejournal.com) wrote in davis_square2008-07-10 09:51 pm
Entry tags:
Message from Tom Champion (verbatim)
From the beginning, my informal communication via LiveJournal has been problematic for a variety of reasons:
* When am I speaking for myself, and when for the city?
* Am I setting myself up as some alternate channel that competes with legitimate lines of inquiry and process, such as 311? Am I just ego-tripping?
* My "tone" has been questioned on several occasions and I certainly don't want anybody to judge the city by one snarky employee -- especially since I have the responsibility to speak officially for the city as well.
* Twice in as many weeks I have, in a rush to be timely, mis-communicated on important issues, and had to apologize for it.
* My first responsibility at all times is to my friends and colleagues in city government. They're my team and I must never create even the appearance of second-guessing them -- because I'm not. It's simply inappropriate for me to pretend that I can "unofficially" take part in any online community -- even as decent and thoughtful a community as DSLJ.
This was, therefore, a mistake. The InterWebs are tricky places, and we learn as we go.
In future, I think the best way for people to communicate with City Hall is to call or email 311 -- and the best way for City Hall to communicate with DSLJ members is by official announcement only, so I will explore setting up an account for that purpose.
* When am I speaking for myself, and when for the city?
* Am I setting myself up as some alternate channel that competes with legitimate lines of inquiry and process, such as 311? Am I just ego-tripping?
* My "tone" has been questioned on several occasions and I certainly don't want anybody to judge the city by one snarky employee -- especially since I have the responsibility to speak officially for the city as well.
* Twice in as many weeks I have, in a rush to be timely, mis-communicated on important issues, and had to apologize for it.
* My first responsibility at all times is to my friends and colleagues in city government. They're my team and I must never create even the appearance of second-guessing them -- because I'm not. It's simply inappropriate for me to pretend that I can "unofficially" take part in any online community -- even as decent and thoughtful a community as DSLJ.
This was, therefore, a mistake. The InterWebs are tricky places, and we learn as we go.
In future, I think the best way for people to communicate with City Hall is to call or email 311 -- and the best way for City Hall to communicate with DSLJ members is by official announcement only, so I will explore setting up an account for that purpose.
no subject
no subject
As far as I can tell he enjoyed basking in attention until the first minor incident in which he flounced tremendously.
no subject
The "basking in attention" thing was always questionable and has a lot to do with why I shouldn't do this anymore.
And nobody should gang up on on_reserve for being right or being snarky: what I learned was that I shouldn't interfere to the degree that I had begun to. As I told on_reserve offline, this wasn't Jim Kotzuba's mistake. It was mine.
Re-flouncing.
no subject
no subject
But you could change your name to [
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject