Message from Tom Champion (verbatim)
Jul. 10th, 2008 09:51 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
From the beginning, my informal communication via LiveJournal has been problematic for a variety of reasons:
* When am I speaking for myself, and when for the city?
* Am I setting myself up as some alternate channel that competes with legitimate lines of inquiry and process, such as 311? Am I just ego-tripping?
* My "tone" has been questioned on several occasions and I certainly don't want anybody to judge the city by one snarky employee -- especially since I have the responsibility to speak officially for the city as well.
* Twice in as many weeks I have, in a rush to be timely, mis-communicated on important issues, and had to apologize for it.
* My first responsibility at all times is to my friends and colleagues in city government. They're my team and I must never create even the appearance of second-guessing them -- because I'm not. It's simply inappropriate for me to pretend that I can "unofficially" take part in any online community -- even as decent and thoughtful a community as DSLJ.
This was, therefore, a mistake. The InterWebs are tricky places, and we learn as we go.
In future, I think the best way for people to communicate with City Hall is to call or email 311 -- and the best way for City Hall to communicate with DSLJ members is by official announcement only, so I will explore setting up an account for that purpose.
* When am I speaking for myself, and when for the city?
* Am I setting myself up as some alternate channel that competes with legitimate lines of inquiry and process, such as 311? Am I just ego-tripping?
* My "tone" has been questioned on several occasions and I certainly don't want anybody to judge the city by one snarky employee -- especially since I have the responsibility to speak officially for the city as well.
* Twice in as many weeks I have, in a rush to be timely, mis-communicated on important issues, and had to apologize for it.
* My first responsibility at all times is to my friends and colleagues in city government. They're my team and I must never create even the appearance of second-guessing them -- because I'm not. It's simply inappropriate for me to pretend that I can "unofficially" take part in any online community -- even as decent and thoughtful a community as DSLJ.
This was, therefore, a mistake. The InterWebs are tricky places, and we learn as we go.
In future, I think the best way for people to communicate with City Hall is to call or email 311 -- and the best way for City Hall to communicate with DSLJ members is by official announcement only, so I will explore setting up an account for that purpose.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 01:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:14 am (UTC)All very reasonable, and if hanging around here was putting him in an awkward place, I certainly wouldn't want that.
But even so:
:(
no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:14 am (UTC)I'll never forget the "Move da caas. plz" icon.
This makes me incredibly sad. I will miss his helpful posts. A lot.
I thought we could somehow get around the internet trickies.
Tell him I said "Many thanks!" *sniff*
no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:27 am (UTC)The problem with that is, no matter how much the person says they aren't speaking in an official capacity, and whatever handle they use, someone, somewhere, will figure out it's them, and construe the slightest slip up in the worst way, and take them to task, publicly, as the official - even if it is a personal opinion. In this day and age, no matter what we may like, representatives of organizations are NEVER off the record as their official position.
google bruce tait, quincy police patrol officers association, and diane feinstein
no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:23 am (UTC)This is very sad.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 03:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 10:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 01:08 pm (UTC)Tom, if you're reading this, you should know that knowing you're listening here will almost definitely make me more likely to re-elect the mayor because I feel like I have a friend at city hall that actually cares about what I have to say!
no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 03:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 04:36 am (UTC)Mr. Champion, your efforts to better the lines of communication between the city government and the city residents were appreciated. I hope the city government will consider instituting some official equivalent to what you were trying to do here--there are clearly pitfalls, but there are also clearly benefits to semi-formal internet communication with residents. (Perhaps a dept. of communications-maintained city blog would serve that purpose, similar to the Somerville Public Library blog? Something that helps to give an accessible human face to city government, without compromising the necessary sense of professionalism?)
the term you're looking for is Ombudsman
Date: 2008-07-11 12:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 03:17 pm (UTC)As far as I can tell he enjoyed basking in attention until the first minor incident in which he flounced tremendously.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 04:05 pm (UTC)The "basking in attention" thing was always questionable and has a lot to do with why I shouldn't do this anymore.
And nobody should gang up on on_reserve for being right or being snarky: what I learned was that I shouldn't interfere to the degree that I had begun to. As I told on_reserve offline, this wasn't Jim Kotzuba's mistake. It was mine.
Re-flouncing.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 04:09 pm (UTC)But you could change your name to [
no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-12 03:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-12 06:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-12 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 08:03 am (UTC)Thanks for everything!
Oh, poo?
Date: 2008-07-11 12:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 01:02 pm (UTC)But, as someone who has had a job interacting with the public, I get how hard that line can be.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 01:05 pm (UTC)But do I fault his reasoning for no longer using LJ to disperse info? Yes, I do.
He's been straddling the line, as he says, between being "just good ol' Tom, your friend who knows stuff about how the city works" and "city official, Tom Champion" and dispersing information and answering questions in an informal, unofficial way. Yes, it's been problematic, just as anything involving complex, sometimes archaic laws and upset citizens can be.
But I think it's shown how fantastic it is to live in a city where the officials recognize that a LJ community is a great way to communicate with citizens. It's 2008, the citizens use computers, and we've got tools like LiveJournal, Twitter, etc that can disperse info immediately and allow for dialogue. I know that Tom's updates have been vital for me during snow emergencies, traffic and construction problems, and the like.
So maybe it's time for the city to make it official. Make Tom the City Blogger. It was NOT a mistake for him to venture into LJ territory, it was brilliant, and should be an example of how a city government can connect with the people.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 01:12 pm (UTC)Rather than thinking "Man, that Tom, he's so unprofessional" it actually got me thinking "hey, wouldn't it be cool if the next president would blog about the things going on in the white house?"
Governments of all kinds usually feel so inaccessible and impersonal, and I think that's really a shame when these people are actually elected by us and are supposed to represent our needs.
Also, for the record, it was a LOT easier for me to get other Davis Square residents to join the community when they thought that a city official might be reading what they had to write (and responding personally! Whoa!)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:42 pm (UTC)Tom, I for one liked you here because you presented a fun side to local politics and we- the members of this community- felt like we had someone in City Hall that knew we existed and cared enough to get off his butt, join the 21st century, and use da intahwebs to interact with constituents.
You provided something different than 311. If we needed a lengthy explanation, you were the man to contact. You could get us the straight poop. If I need to know something simple, like how to properly dispose of dead hookers, I can call 311 for that. But explaining the whys- like why I can't just burn their bodies on my lawn on the 1st and 3rd Thursdays of the month between April and December without getting a ticket- we needed your assistance.
Look, it is tricky ground here, trying to walk the line between being our friend and being a representative of the city. To cop from Dubya, "it's hard work". But we appreciated the effort very much, appreciated your voice, and understand your desire not to step on the toes of your coworkers.
And yeah, being out in the open on the intahwebs, people will take shots at you and things can get a little harsh and you want to tell them to eat shit and howl at the moon, but can't because you're here in a quasi-official capacity. But people taking shots- that's normal, and a price to pay for the medium. Doesn't make it right or take the sting away from it, but so long as you don't pull an Obama and stay true to your principles and don't say/write one thing and do another or lie to us, that's what really counts. And that's why we liked having you around- we could get the truth from you and most of us trusted you. And if someone (ahem) didn't, well, engage them with the truth, have an exchange, someone snarks the exchange with a drama llama macro, and we all move along to the next issue.
I for one hope you come back. There's a lot of "old" Somerville still out there running things, and you were someone who made the effort to bring "new" Somervillians (is that correct? villians?) into the process and give us a voice. So c'mon back and let the cat macros roll! Or LOL.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 06:23 pm (UTC)It will soon be pretty much a requirement for all political representatives who want to be seen as important. But it's going to take the more extraordinary and courageous ones to be the explorers of the medium. I thank you for trying Tom, and wish you well as you figure out how to make it work if you ever choose to do so again.
I went through this a while back when I worked for a non-profit. The solution we came up with was to use my own account on my own time with my nickname for personal purposes, and use an official account with my job title for official stuff I did while getting paid or officially volunteering. It worked out well for us.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 07:10 pm (UTC)