So, back to the buskers....

[candyleonard.livejournal.com]

It sounds like there is a lot of neutral, a lot of negative, and a lot of positive (though "better than traffic noise" is not exactly a stellar endorsement of buskers). It sounds like there is some room for improvement and increased variety in the music that we are confronted with in the square.

Comments

[mzrowan.livejournal.com]

I'm with redcolumbine -- I didn't think your first post was especially leading, but making a second post summarizing the first and re-opening the topic? I'm curious to know what your goal is here, 'cause I'd rather know it up front than have you keep "casually" bringing up the topic of buskers weekly.

[surrealestate.livejournal.com]

I echo this and the previous comments. Say what you're trying to say. This whole "discuss amongst yourselves" thing is just annoying, and is also why you aren't seeing much in the way of thoughtful replies.

buskers, follow-up

[candyleonard.livejournal.com]

Actually I didn't write that. I forwarded the thread to an interested friend who is not especially tech savvy and he responded and it showed up me. (I guess I'm not that tech savvy either!)

Re: buskers, follow-up

[mzrowan.livejournal.com]

You're seriously trying to tell me that you didn't make this post (http://community.livejournal.com/davis_square/1707270.html)? If that's true, then someone else has your LJ password and you need to do something about it. However, I strongly doubt it is.

Re: buskers, follow-up

[ron_newman]

If you're posting for someone else, that's fine, but you should say so and preferably identify the other person (at least with a pseudonym)