http://candyleonard.livejournal.com/ (
candyleonard.livejournal.com) wrote in
davis_square2009-04-01 11:39 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
So, back to the buskers....
It sounds like there is a lot of neutral, a lot of negative, and a lot of positive (though "better than traffic noise" is not exactly a stellar endorsement of buskers). It sounds like there is some room for improvement and increased variety in the music that we are confronted with in the square.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
I think "variety" is not the solution to "lack of quality" -- so, what is your intended agenda here?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
buskers, follow-up
Re: buskers, follow-up
Re: buskers, follow-up
Yes
Maybe a troupe of mimes should take over the busketeering; then everyone would be happy, except those who have mime-o-phobia or something.
Re: Yes
Re: Yes
Re: Yes
Re: Yes
Re: Yes
Re: Yes
Re: Yes
Re: Yes
Re: Yes
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
How about dropping this ridiculous issue?
no subject
no subject