http://winterhill.livejournal.com/ (
winterhill.livejournal.com) wrote in
davis_square2009-06-30 11:55 am
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
More on Parking
An article in the Somerville Journal quotes Alderman Pero as saying "city officials can't give in to constituent concerns." Huh? Isn't this otherwise known as listening to the people who voted you into office? And will vote you out? I understand they haven't come up with the right answer yet, but this statement is arrogant and lame.
Link to the full article:
http://www.wickedlocal.com/somerville/town_info/government/x1885874713/Somerville-aldermen-split-on-citywide-permit-parking
Link to the full article:
http://www.wickedlocal.com/somerville/town_info/government/x1885874713/Somerville-aldermen-split-on-citywide-permit-parking
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
OTOH there are a number of problems with this proposal, such as the inability to allow people to park for more than 2 hours even if they pay to do so (for example to see a movie or a show) and the lack of flexibility in general. So while I think it might help me, with my permit, park for free, I still think it needs some work. If redone well I think it would actually make the City more money, not less.
no subject
And causing more...if I'd like to throw a party, or heck, have more than 2 cars of non-residents come visit, I used to tell people they could park on Elm, which was a block away, and *always* has parking. Now, though....if they need to use the parking permit, they're going to park as close to my place as they can - faster to get the permit back and forth, and in spots normally used and wanted by tenants. Having fewer 'safe haven streets' where visiting non-residents can park even if the walk is further means more competition for the really desirable spots.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's just poorly thought out; it might eliminate a little non-resident parking in really congested areas, but it's going to make the lives of a disproportionate number of residents in south Porter, Union, Winter Hill areas more difficult, while repairing an issue that *doesn't exist* in this part.
no subject
no subject
Rebekah Gewirtz (Ward 6) is opposed, but she's been good on this issue (as on most others) and I'd absolutely like to keep her around.
no subject
At the very least, if I still live here in Somerville this next election, I'm going to write in "none of the above" for the rest of them. Unfortunately, we're not allowed to call for votes of no confidence in our government, and this will have to suffice.
no subject
no subject
What they mean is making every street in the city permit-only or metered.
no subject
no subject
Taxes and fees are never popular, but the city needs to raise money from somewhere. If elected officials only did what constituents told them too, governments would never be able to do anything.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Well? Now there is!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I spoke with Trane, and he admitted it was a money grab. not only will they get to ticket more, they also are going to pull in the permit fees for cars that didn't necessarily have to register before and will now.
I'd be fully in support of this if they'd go back to the days of phone registering parties/gatherings, or introducing some other self-service option that doesn't require a trip to an office that is barely open, much less open at convenient hours for people with, you know, jobs. (you used to be able to call T&P, tell them you were having a party, the time and number of guests, and that was that). If anyone got a ticket, you could go and get them rescinded without even a hearing. Presumably the person walking that neighborhood beat was told about the party, because we never had guests get hit when we did that. At my current house, Broadway is a few minute's walk away, and ALWAYS has parking available.
While we're at it, can we PLEASE kill the stupid 48 hour rule? Hi, I drive my car once every week or two, and commute to work by T. Don't make me go out, start it, roll it a few feet, and park it again because I have some neighbor who is an ass. The 24 hour rule (its not actually 48, but 24) exists so the city can force cars to move by posting signs in the event they need to do some emergency roadwork.
no subject
> [Provide 24-hr self-service party passes and ditch the 48-hr rule.]
This. I agree with the mayor's argument (http://somervillenews.typepad.com/the_somerville_news/2009/06/parking-its-all-about-access.html) that making parking free causes a scarce resource to be poorly utilized, but business (and/or their patrons) and residents need to be able to pay a fair price for their use of city streets.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I personally find it offensive, that on top of the taxes we pay, we must park for the privilege of actually using the streets we are paying for. I don't think the city/state/federal government ever seriously cuts costs, and that's the problem.