http://winterhill.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] winterhill.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] davis_square2009-06-30 11:55 am

More on Parking

An article in the Somerville Journal quotes Alderman Pero as saying "city officials can't give in to constituent concerns."  Huh?  Isn't this otherwise known as listening to the people who voted you into office?  And will vote you out?  I understand they haven't come up with the right answer yet, but this statement is arrogant and lame.

Link to the full article:
http://www.wickedlocal.com/somerville/town_info/government/x1885874713/Somerville-aldermen-split-on-citywide-permit-parking

[identity profile] thespian.livejournal.com 2009-06-30 05:06 pm (UTC)(link)
If you don't have a permit now you can only park in non-permit parking. So if you make the whole city permit parking it reduces the number of cars that can park in that area, actually alleviating a problem.

And causing more...if I'd like to throw a party, or heck, have more than 2 cars of non-residents come visit, I used to tell people they could park on Elm, which was a block away, and *always* has parking. Now, though....if they need to use the parking permit, they're going to park as close to my place as they can - faster to get the permit back and forth, and in spots normally used and wanted by tenants. Having fewer 'safe haven streets' where visiting non-residents can park even if the walk is further means more competition for the really desirable spots.

[identity profile] thespian.livejournal.com 2009-06-30 05:07 pm (UTC)(link)
i should note that the section of Elm I am near is permit free in the evenings and weekends; it's down south of Porter.

[identity profile] masswich.livejournal.com 2009-06-30 05:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree. I was only referring to the issue of people parking near T stations for the day. There should definitely be some "safe havens" for visitors who don't live in Somerville. Down in the South End they have some of these spaces, although they are usually all taken.

[identity profile] chenoameg.livejournal.com 2009-06-30 05:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I have been told by traffic and parking that guest permits are for your street and cross street only, not for the entire zone on the permit.

[identity profile] thespian.livejournal.com 2009-06-30 05:45 pm (UTC)(link)
all the more reason this is a bad idea. Right now, my guests don't *have* to park on my doorstep. They can park on Elm south of Cedar, which always has space, and is an easy 1-block walk to my place (it always has space because almost every building along there has a parking lot or driveway, so the residents park off street for most of Elm from Cedar south to Somerville Ave.). If the permit limits them to my street and the cross street, then even if they wanted to park on spacious, always available Elm, they couldn't (my street runs parallel to Elm; a different street would be my cross street).

It's just poorly thought out; it might eliminate a little non-resident parking in really congested areas, but it's going to make the lives of a disproportionate number of residents in south Porter, Union, Winter Hill areas more difficult, while repairing an issue that *doesn't exist* in this part.

[identity profile] sonofabish.livejournal.com 2009-07-01 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)
All the more reason to vote every single person in office from the Mayor on down out of office the next election.

[personal profile] ron_newman 2009-07-02 02:19 am (UTC)(link)
That would be hard since almost nobody has an opponent, and the filing deadine has passed.

Rebekah Gewirtz (Ward 6) is opposed, but she's been good on this issue (as on most others) and I'd absolutely like to keep her around.
Edited 2009-07-02 02:20 (UTC)

[identity profile] sonofabish.livejournal.com 2009-07-02 02:22 am (UTC)(link)
Ok, we'll do that for Rebekah. You're correct there.

At the very least, if I still live here in Somerville this next election, I'm going to write in "none of the above" for the rest of them. Unfortunately, we're not allowed to call for votes of no confidence in our government, and this will have to suffice.