ext_162677 (
georgy.livejournal.com) wrote in
davis_square2009-07-12 09:56 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Parking task force recommendations
As linked to in Rebekah Gewirtz's newsletter:
http://www.somervillema.gov/NewsDetail.cfm?instance_id=1481
http://www.somervillema.gov/NewsDetail.cfm?instance_id=1481
no subject
As for the idea that "lets do something sucky, but so much less sucky than the completely insane and out of line thing we proposed at first, the it'll look okay and people can't complain because it's such a big improvement." I have to say as someone who worked on the parking task force you have it wrong. It is not about making things "look okay" or stopping complaints. People complain no matter what the plan, they complain about how things are now, how they might be, how they should be, about anything and everything. Nobody at these meetings was worried about eradicating complaints. And it's not about "doing something sucky." We had the impossible goal of balancing the needs of the city (i.e. revenue), the needs of residents, and the needs of businesses. Of course nobody gets exactly what they want, nobody is 100% happy, but we tried to make things better than the initial proposal, NOT to make things look a certain way or some conspiracy to fool people.
no subject
no subject
If Somerville scraps the current parking changes entirely, and then later comes up with a new plan to change parking restrictions on a few major streets, with clearly communicated, sensible reasons for doing so, that could work out.
The current process is irreparably tainted. Many of us absolutely do not trust the city on this. It's not the fault of the new parking task force, and even you admit that you had an impossible task. The result sucks. The city is making use of the fact that they started with something so bad that anything less can look "better" in comparison to the earlier fantasy. The fact that they put you in that position means that you, the parking task force, could do nothing to prevent that except to say "do nothing now, city, because you really fucked up. try again later."
no subject
If they want to make people who park overnight buy a permit, why not require permits just between 2 AM and 6 AM?
(And here's a crazy idea to boost revenue: allow anyone to park on any currently-permit street, if they pay a few dollars at a pay-and-display machine. A lot of cities have that scheme.)