[personal profile] ron_newman 2013-08-22 05:01 pm (UTC)(link)
But if all the office space is to be occupied by Tufts, as the city report seems to indicate, it won't actually add any new "places to work" or "commercial/office development." Therefore, I don't see the benefit of this proposal.
smammy: (Default)

[personal profile] smammy 2013-08-22 05:26 pm (UTC)(link)
In the Tufts proposal, all the office space is labeled "Administration", leading me to believe that you are correct. But, I suppose people will work in those offices whether they're occupied by Tufts or rented to other tenants...
Edited 2013-08-22 17:26 (UTC)

[personal profile] ron_newman 2013-08-22 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)
But if they are people who already work for Tufts, there's no net benefit to Somerville.
smammy: (Default)

[personal profile] smammy 2013-08-22 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)
It's plausible that Tufts wants more office space because they are growing and thus hiring more staff.

[identity profile] somerfriend.livejournal.com 2013-08-22 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
You must really dislike Tufts :-)

Daytime foot traffic is happening from the new office space. Property taxes happening. Fits the bill. If you don't believe there is a net benefit, what is the negative that is offsetting the benefit? The fact that the increase in office space is taken by an expanding Tufts or a new business moving into Somerville is a debate one could have, but there is a benefit in either case.

[personal profile] ron_newman 2013-08-22 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't dislike Tufts at all. I'd just prefer to see this be a place for new businesses.

[identity profile] somerfriend.livejournal.com 2013-08-22 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't disagree with that sentiment. So I'd amend your earlier statement to instead of "no net benefit" to "could be an even bigger benefit than it is".

[identity profile] somervilleguy.livejournal.com 2013-08-23 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
I dislike Tufts.