davis_square | Property values in Davis Sq (and Somerville)

Current Mood: confused

Entry tags:

Property values in Davis Sq (and Somerville)

I just saw in the Somerville News an estimate saying that property values in Somerville declined 2% this year:
http://www.thesomervillenews.com/main.asp?SectionID=2&SubSectionID=2&ArticleID=218. Somebody mentioned that Zillow actually reports a loss of about 8%. This is confusing. The Editor of the Somerville News pointed out that Zillow does not have accurate estimates. In my experience, Zillow is pretty on the mark when it comes to sale prices, they seem to be doing lots of good stats on their datasets. Any idea on how to gather additional information on this? I doubt one can trust the Somerville News, given that it was created by the owners of ERA, one of the Somerville Real Estate agencies (clearly, they would not want to advertise that property values are going down around here).

One funny tidbit. Have you received a pack of coupon last week? I received one, and one of the coupons was an ad for ERA, the Norton Group. It says: "Voted #1 Real Estate Company 2000 to 2007 By the readers of the Somerville News"! Now, when many of the readers are ERA employees or relatives of ERA employees, that is a bit of a conflict of interest, isn't it? :)

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

The Somerville News attributed the figure to the city assessors, so as far as setting the tax rate, that's the only important figure.

The Warren Group, who publish Banker & Tradesman, is the most authoritative source for Mass home sales data. I just checked their figures and they show about a 6% decline on all sales through October. The number is -13% for single-family homes and -2% for condos.

Of course, sales data do not necessarily reflect the overall change to the tax base, unless you assume that one year's sales are perfectly representative of the overall housing stock. This could explain the discrepancy between sales figures and the city assessor's figures.

In my experience, Zillow has been a random-number generator. Way too much GIGO.

When you say that number is a 6% decline on all sales, do you mean that the average price is down 6% or that 6% fewer units were sold (compared to 1 YR ago). Regarding Zillow, I have a few friends on the West Coast who sold their places a few months ago, and they got almost exactly what Zillow had predicted. I don't know if there are any objective numbers on how well it does, though...

huh. when i was tracking real estate prices more closely, a year and a half ago or so, zillow was crack-smokingly optimistic in its estimates. maybe they've gotten more accurate.

zillow is notoriously flawed in its data, i was absolutely correct in making that statement over at the somerville news website...

the somerville news wasnt created by the owners of era - it was created in 1969 - and not for nothing, but if property sales prices came down, that would eventually translate into more sales, actually, so it doesnt makes a lot of sense saying the real estate people wouldnt want to advertise lower prices

the somerville news best of series was around long before era was associated with the newspaper - check it out, its easy to find out the right information on that

wow it amazes me that people can be that misinformed, and then make snide commentary based on said misinformation...why dont you take the time to actually find out what you are making snide comments about before you make them? is it really that hard? do you really hate people for no particular reason? at least i have a valid reason when i say i cant stand snotty, arrogant asshats that don't have a clue.

when setting the tax rate - only data from the city assessors is important

as far as getting a wider snapshot of the actual real estate market and its imperfect representation to those who cannot begin to understand the complexities of it - the warren group (the standard for accurate real estate data) - is the most accurate information source available today in the boston area

zillow is one of the worst data sources i have ever seen in this business - in this market - and i have been doing this a very long time and analyze data relative to this industry on a constant basis today

the more frightening aspect of the original post of this thread is the subtle inference that actual news stories in the newspaper have ever even once been influenced by the owners of the newspaper - that's another laughable and completely arrogant misconception

That's a really pleasant attitude to take over anyone that disagrees with you. You've cheered my morning.

I agree. I'm wondering if

jamesnorton does, in fact, work for the News, or if he's with a rival paper. Because based on his attitude & comments here, I'm pretty much ready to avoid the paper entirely - which would be a bitchin' strategy for any competitor to take.

But perhaps I am overthinking things....

I think I remember the last time he joined our discussion--I do believe he is in fact affiliated.

see: http://community.livejournal.com/davis_square/1490129.html

Two things re: assessment values.

1) The new assessment is based on values as of Jan. 1, 2008, compared to Jan. 1, 2007. So the 2 percent change supposedly represents the change in property values during 2007 -- not this year. (The assessments are always a year behind.)

2) Are assessments more reliable than zillow? I don't really know. But when I look at home sales, I've noticed the numbers often differ substantially from assessments. Has anyone else noticed that? If you bought or sold a home in the past few years, was the assessment on the mark?

"why dont you take the time to actually find out what you are making snide comments about before you make them? is it really that hard? do you really hate people for no particular reason? at least i have a valid reason when i say i cant stand snotty, arrogant asshats that don't have a clue."

Right back atcha.

the more frightening aspect of the original post of this thread is the subtle inference that actual news stories in the newspaper have ever even once been influenced by the owners of the newspaper - that's another laughable and completely arrogant misconception

Are you being sarcastic? This happens with every newspaper.

actually, no, if what i typed read that i was trying to imply that assessments were reliable with respect to the market, then that isn't correct. when determining taxes, assessments are the benchmark - that's all. assessments with respect to real world valuation (the market) are notoriously flawed for a number of reasons which would take hours to explain.

when it comes to the marketplace in the boston (all of new england actually) zillow is notoriously flawed...it's hard to pinpoint why, esp given the fact that it is true, zillow has been very much on target in a city like san francisco.

i took offense to the person making the snide comments - nothing that could have been considered a "disagreement" as far as opinions or statements of fact...

"few friends on the West Coast who sold their places a few months ago, and they got almost exactly what Zillow had predicted."

Um. Is that because the buyers checked Zillow and adjusted their offer accordingly?

I meant the median sale price is 6% down compared to a year ago. Number of sales throuch October is down about 11%.

Zillow says it has something like a +/- 7% accuracy, which is a $56,000 spread on the median Somerville home value of $400,000. The Wall Street Journal did a quick test last year using 1,000 recent sales and found that roughly to the be case, 7.8% median difference (absolute value), even split high and low. 11% of the sales were more than 25% off. The net-net is that Zillow data is overly reliant on public data (number of bed/bath, size of plot, comp sales) and can't accommodate for things like recent renovations -- other than relying on public assessments to reflect the renovations.

To the contrary, assuming that stories in the newspaper about an issue potentially affecting the owners' source of revenue are not biased would be laughable naivety.

So, do you find that Zillow usually underestimates the value of Somerville properties?

You are ensuring that I will never even go near the Somerville News. Cheers!

This happens with every newspaper.

Take it from the son of a journalist: it doesn't happen nearly as often as is claimed. Here's what usually happens:

1) Bob is interviewed by newspaper.

2) Journalist also interviews Clod's opponent, Rob.

3) Journalist files story reporting on the opinions of Bob and Rob, plus the key facts of the issue, which is his job.

4) Bob and Rob read the paper and are absolutely livid that that asshole journalist had the nerve to include the opinions of his opponent or anything that might otherwise contradict their position, and writes a lengthy, pissy letter about how the newspaper is totally biased and the paper is corrupt and blah blah blah.

This isn't to say there aren't infractions and conflicts of interest in any newspaper's history. Nobody's perfect. It's just you should approach any claims about biased media, especially from somebody with an agenda, with the skepticism you would approach a used car salesman who refers to himself as "Honest."

That said, it looks like nvidia is onto something here.

With respect to Zillow, I've found its prices for Somerville to be unreliable for a couple of reasons:

1) It isn't really very good about factoring in proximity to public transportation. Being a five minute walk from the red line vs a 25 minute walk is a big difference for buyers, but looking at Zillow's comparables it doesn't seem to account for them very well.

2) It doesn't account very well for the level of supply in the market - typically there are a lot more condos available around here than single family homes, which is a little bit unusual.

3) People can edit the features of their property in Zillow and I did notice people adding questionable features the last time I was looking for property. I saw things like listing both a dining room and an extra bedroom that were really the same room, including A/C when they had window units rather than central air, etc.

If what you're looking at is the median price, I don't think it's going to tell you a lot. As the market slowed down, fewer new renovations and such will be available on the market, so the median price may move down much more than the price on any "average" unit moves down.

The article is talking about the assessed values, which will tend to change somewhat less than the market values. The statement that the assessed values declined by 2% is a statement of fact, quoted from the assessors, and you could presumably verify it by calling the assessor's office and asking them for yourself. But it's important to keep in mind that the assessed price is not necessarily the market price. Any particular property can potentially sell for significantly more or less than its assessed value.

Also, from yesterday's Globe article:

"Assessments, calculated largely off the previous calendar year's sales, lag the market. As a result, the average assessed value for homes is likely to dip again this year - as it has for many of the communities whose figures have recently been certified - and could do so next year as well."

I am concerned that someone who has an editorial position does not know the difference between an implication and an inference.

I cry for the English language....

You want underestimation? Take a look at the values realtor.com coughs up.

The writer implies, the reader infers. I don't see a real problem here.

If you (say) renovate an old 2-family that's in disrepair into two shiny new condos, the assessment would presumably not catch up until the next year. So in cases like that I would expect the assessment to be pretty different from the sale price at the time of sale.

Again, your classiness shines every time you end up posting here. Even a five year old learns to stop embarrassing himself the same way after the second or third time he does something.

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

Page 1 of 4

Property values in Davis Sq (and Somerville)

no subject

Not sure I understand.

no subject

wow what a misinformed person

thanks laryu

Re: wow what a misinformed person

Re: wow what a misinformed person

Re: wow what a misinformed person

no subject

Re: wow what a misinformed person

Re: thanks laryu

no subject

Re: Not sure I understand.

Re: Not sure I understand.

Re: thanks laryu

Zillow again.

Re: wow what a misinformed person

Re: thanks laryu

no subject

no subject

Re: wow what a misinformed person

Re: Zillow again.

Re: wow what a misinformed person

no subject

Re: wow what a misinformed person