http://fefie.livejournal.com/ (
fefie.livejournal.com) wrote in
davis_square2009-06-03 12:11 am
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Airplane Noise Hearing today at 2:00, Suffolk County Superior Court in Boston
[Forwarded from the city's ResiStat mailing list.]
Dear Members of the ResiStat community:
I wanted to share some important information we just received concerning the aircraft noise issue here in Somerville. On Wednesday, June 3, 2009, at 2:00 pm at Courtroom 1017, Suffolk County Superior Court in Boston, Somerville’s attorneys will appear with other parties to make a Motion to Re-Open the Runway 14/32 litigation. It would be helpful if as many Somerville residents as possible made an appearance at the actual hearing. (Suffolk Superior Court is located at Three Pemberton Square, right behind the office building fronting 100 Cambridge Street in Boston, which is directly across the street from Boston’s City Hall Plaza. It is accessible by walking from the MBTA’s Park Street station; the Government Center Green Line station is even closer. Additionally, there is parking beside the Suffolk County Courthouse at the Center Plaza Garage.)
The City’s argument will be that Runway 14/32, which opened in November 2006, is being used in ways that are in conflict with a limited use restriction that it was to be used only during significant wind events. As a result, the FAA and Massport are in violation of the 2004 court order that allowed 14/32 construction to proceed. The theory – for which we believe we have solid evidence – is that the FAA has started using 14/32 in a new runway configuration designed to reduce ground congestion and delay, which in turn has led to a sharp increase in the number of takeoffs from Runway 33L (which sends traffic directly over Somerville).
If you can attend yourself, and encourage others to attend, it will be helpful to the cause of noise relief. Please spread the word.
Thomas P. Champion
Director of Communications
City of Somerville
tel










617-625-6600
ext.2620
fax 617-776-8061
tchampion@somervillema.gov
www.somervillema.gov
Dear Members of the ResiStat community:
I wanted to share some important information we just received concerning the aircraft noise issue here in Somerville. On Wednesday, June 3, 2009, at 2:00 pm at Courtroom 1017, Suffolk County Superior Court in Boston, Somerville’s attorneys will appear with other parties to make a Motion to Re-Open the Runway 14/32 litigation. It would be helpful if as many Somerville residents as possible made an appearance at the actual hearing. (Suffolk Superior Court is located at Three Pemberton Square, right behind the office building fronting 100 Cambridge Street in Boston, which is directly across the street from Boston’s City Hall Plaza. It is accessible by walking from the MBTA’s Park Street station; the Government Center Green Line station is even closer. Additionally, there is parking beside the Suffolk County Courthouse at the Center Plaza Garage.)
The City’s argument will be that Runway 14/32, which opened in November 2006, is being used in ways that are in conflict with a limited use restriction that it was to be used only during significant wind events. As a result, the FAA and Massport are in violation of the 2004 court order that allowed 14/32 construction to proceed. The theory – for which we believe we have solid evidence – is that the FAA has started using 14/32 in a new runway configuration designed to reduce ground congestion and delay, which in turn has led to a sharp increase in the number of takeoffs from Runway 33L (which sends traffic directly over Somerville).
If you can attend yourself, and encourage others to attend, it will be helpful to the cause of noise relief. Please spread the word.
Thomas P. Champion
Director of Communications
City of Somerville
tel













fax 617-776-8061
tchampion@somervillema.gov
www.somervillema.gov
Isn't this going to piss off....
I'm all for this but 2PM on a Wed...
Understood, but it's a court hearing
Re: Understood, but it's a court hearing
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
There is a court case with a ruling that alows use of runway 33L only during significant wind events. The airport has been ignoring that case. That's part of what makes airplane noise over Somerville special.
Finally, Somerville has seven hills and many natural amphitheatres. If you live on the good side of a hill, you might not hear any airplane noise. This doesn't mean that you should prevent your neighbors from complaining about problems they are having.
no subject
but as I recall the new runway (33L) was identified by locals as having a potential negative impact on certain neighborhoods of Somerville *before* 33L opened in 2006. The outcry then fell on deaf ears, so to speak.
Some background on the situation can be found here:
http://www.somervillestep.org/2007/07/more_plane_nois.html
no subject
no subject
And no, not every plane can fly in over the ocean.
But those who are against
no subject
I mean, damn.... yeah, on some days planes fly over, but this isn't like East Boston back in the 70s, where at my grandmother's house on Saratoga St, planes came about 200' over her neighborhood every 45 seconds almost every single day.
And have any of these NIMBYs spent any time over in Dorchester or Southie?
This is just an embarrassment, it really really is.
no subject
I agree, it's way worse at my parents' house (in Dorchester). I think I've only heard planes a couple times since I moved to Somerville (4 years ago). It's really just not that bad here.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
And frankly the trucks are a much bigger problem than the airplane noise, even if no one ever had the foresight to ban them when they built the road (or when they invented semi trucks, since I'm betting the road came first).
Now the truth comes out. Finally.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Proud of Curtatone, actually.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yup, the Somerville fireworks, for example.
no subject
no subject
no subject
The theory – for which we believe we have solid evidence – is that the FAA has started using 14/32 in a new runway configuration designed to reduce ground congestion and delay
This would seem to suggest that reducing delays is at least what they were trying to accomplish, and it doesn't look like anyone's planning to say that it had no impact on delays.
no subject
It looks like
no subject
no subject
Please. Please. Please. Make this whole argument stop.
Simple solution:
Re: Simple solution:
Re: Simple solution:
Re: Simple solution:
It has actually been suggested by more than one person that I go to counseling.
No, I'm not joking.
Yes, I realize it's sad.
Re: Simple solution:
no subject
If the airport wasn't there then there were plans to build one, I could understand. But they chose to live here.
And nobody forces the other fools to read this thread.