http://smoterh.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] smoterh.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] davis_square2009-08-25 09:14 am

H1N1 Vaccination Meeting in Somerville Held by CDC

I don't think I have seen anything here about this so I thought I post this.  Earlier today I received an email from MASS LPA regarding CDC holding a strategy planning meeting regarding the possibility of mandatory mass vaccination program. The meeting is only for Somerville residents and it looks like MASS LPA is looking to organize a protest.

Nevertheless I thought I'd post this as something of interest, or if someone wants to register to attend.

Full email with details

Hello,
                I am writing to you today regarding a very serious matter. It has come to our attention that the CDC will be holding an event in Somerville this Saturday to gauge the publics’ willingness to participate in government mandated vaccination orders. Our researchers have uncovered numerous inconsistencies constitutional issues with what is being proposed. Although we have launched a successful vaccine awareness campaign that is resonating with the people we are reaching out to, we still need additional information. That’s where you come in.
                The CDC event scheduled for this Saturday is set up so that only residents of Somerville may attend. We think this issue is of concern to everyone! Therefore, we have arranged for concerned citizens to be outside the event voicing their opinion. Additionally, we have a couple of people registered to get in, but we need more. My records show that you’re a resident of Somerville as well and as such, we were hoping you might be as concerned as we are and willing to sign up for this very peculiar event. The CDC is actually paying residents $50 to attend. Reports gathered from attended CDC events so far are frightening to say the least. Our goal, with your help, is to simply gather more information about the proposed mandatory vaccination plan. Here’s a little of what we know so far.
·         Baxter was recently caught sending live Avian Flu virus to 18 countries without punitive action and then awarded a contract to provide flu vaccines.
·         Minimal testing has already noted severe neurological disorders in vaccine recipients.
·         Newly proposed legislation threatens mandatory vaccines and warrantless searches / seizures.
·         A patent application by Baxter for a Swine Flu vaccine (H1N1) was filed on 8-28-07, a full two years prior to the arrival of the actual virus.
 
CDC event in Somerville: http://www.masslpa.org/content/cdc-strategy-session-h1n1-somerville-masslpa-protest
Vaccine Awareness Campaign: http://www.masslpa.org/content/neighborhood-outreach-vaccine-awareness-campaign-novac
 
                In conclusion, I hope you are at least interested enough to look in to this issue further, for you own benefit, but moreover, we hope you might be willing to help us by attending this exclusive event and share what transpires. Thank you for your time and attention to this very important matter. Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions or concerns.
 
In Liberty,
Dave Kopacz
Vice President
www.masslpa.org
The Price of Liberty is Eternal Vigilance!

[personal profile] ron_newman 2009-08-25 01:21 pm (UTC)(link)
what is LPA? (Libertarian Party?)

If the meeting you are referring to is this one on Saturday 8/29 at the Armory, I don't see any reference to "mandatory" vaccination. Just 'mass" vaccination, which isn't the same thing. In fact, it even says:
A series of ten sessions will be held around the country before Labor Day, all designed to help state and local health organizations develop a voluntary fall vaccination program for the H1N1 flu virus.
Edited 2009-08-25 13:28 (UTC)

[identity profile] mzrowan.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 01:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Gosh, I'm shocked that this MassLPA group didn't get all its facts straight. Shocked!

[identity profile] mzrowan.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 01:47 pm (UTC)(link)
A little? I suppose they'd rather that half the US gets sick and 30,000 - 90,000 people die (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a8_2nrwYD1kM)?

[personal profile] ron_newman 2009-08-25 01:50 pm (UTC)(link)
"Half get infected" does not necessarily mean "half get sick" .... but yeah. I'm going to get vaccinated as soon as it is available.

[identity profile] mzrowan.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 01:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, good point. Half get infected, 300,000 end up in intensive care, 10 - 30% of the latter group dies.

[identity profile] agnosticoracle.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 02:24 pm (UTC)(link)
As I mentioned later in this thread:

During a typical year in the United States, 30,000 to 50,000 persons die of flu. The problem in 1976 you are referring to is Guillain-Barré Syndrome. There were about 500 cases of flu vaccine related Guillain-Barré Syndrome in 1976, only 25 of which resulted in death.

[identity profile] docorion.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 02:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Or perhaps it's possible that the science of the time just wasn't up to the task of figuring out how many people would be infected.

Influenza scientists are haunted by the pandemic of 1918. They were very afraid that the swine flu they'd just learned about would potentially be another pandemic of equal badness, and they gave the best advice they had at the time. The fact that it turned out to be wrong is a factor of limited data and limited knowledge. Largely due to limited funding of public health.

Current knowledge is better. It is not "good", merely better. (For one thing, funding is not even vaguely 'better', it is in fact markedly worse). And we're still haunted by 1918; if we have another pandemic of that size, vast swathes of infrastructure *worldwide* will simply *stop*. And we *don't know* whether it will happen or not. The fact that it *could* happen is what's driving a lot of decision-making. Because after the pandemic starts, it is overlate to start programs like this; the proverbial cat is out of the bag.

In public health, believe me, there is no shadowy "government" out to get you. There are a bunch of fractious practitioners, many of who trust the government about as much as you (although for different reasons, possibly), but who are more afraid of the pandemic flu, and who *know* that the only group with the funding and the clout to prevent another pandemic is the government.

(And I know this at least in part because I am one of the fractious practitioners, having just finished my indoctrinationtraining at BU and received my MPH. We argue about whether it's necessary too, but the general consensus is that vaccination is the lesser evil by far than the strategy of hoping it won't happen).

As for the implication that we in public health (or government) would like to see "more people die"-I will leave that there with the contempt it deserves, except to point out that your strategy lets a whole lot more people die than mine.
Edited 2009-08-25 14:57 (UTC)

[identity profile] infinitemorning.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 04:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Ditto. I catch at least one nasty flu every year, it seems; I'm not chancing this one.

[identity profile] docorion.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 01:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Live free or die! Except, you know, it's so much better if other people die for liberty.

I, too, am stunned that MassLPA has exaggerated the mandatoriness of the vaccinations just a smidge. They wouldn't do that on purpose, would they? Must be an editing error. No thinking organization interested in giving people real choices based on accurate data would do a thing like that.

Would they?

[identity profile] mzrowan.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 02:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Hee!

I'm wondering if, in your doctoriness, you can find more detailed info about the preliminary trial data than I can. All I can find is news reports that say the results indicate that the vaccine is safe, but that doesn't seem like the level of detail needed to fight a claim that "minimal testing has already noted severe neurological disorders in vaccine recipients". I mean, I'm quite sure it's safe, but I'm not the sort of person who makes claims like that without providing references.

[identity profile] srakkt.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 02:13 pm (UTC)(link)
The bit about neurological disorders is talking about Guillain-Barré Syndrome, which should be a useful search string.

[identity profile] mzrowan.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 02:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Right, I know *their* claim is based on a thirty-year-old incident with a different vaccine. What I'm looking for is current data on *this* vaccine to back up my claim that it's safe.

[identity profile] srakkt.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, sure. I misunderstood the nature of your query.

[identity profile] docorion.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 02:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Haven't seen any data as yet. I have a friend who works at CDC; I can try to get some out of him, but he is generally reluctant to give out advance data, and besides, he works in the foodborne illnesses division. (He was, some years ago, on the Dept. of Agriculture's E.coli O157H7 "Strike Force", which struck both of us as amusing. "Freeze! Department of Agriculture! Put your hands up!")

[identity profile] mzrowan.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 03:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, apparently it's the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases that has the goods (link to news story based on NIAID's press release stating that "the only observed problems have been some redness, swelling and soreness at the injection site" (http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/booster_shots/2009/08/swine-flu-roundup-vaccine-testing-on-track.html), for anyone tempted to believe the Mass LPA's statement that "minimal testing has already noted severe neurological disorders in vaccine recipients").

[identity profile] docorion.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 03:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Shiny-thanks!

Observers may note that I, a member of both the Public Health Conspiracy and the Health Care Conspiracy, am in a high priority group for vaccination, and I will be in the front of the line to get vaccinated when they start doing so.

Of course, since I'm part of the cabal, I will cleverly arrange to receive a placebo, while the rest of you get the Mind Control Virus™

Muahahahaha!

giggle

[identity profile] yagagriswold.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know who you are, but I think I'm in love with you now.

Re: giggle

[identity profile] intuition-ist.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)
...*and* your icon :>

no matter where you go...

[identity profile] srakkt.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 01:41 pm (UTC)(link)

Edit: Gah, sorry, no. That was an inappropriate response for me to make in a public forum. I apologize.
Edited 2009-08-25 13:42 (UTC)

[identity profile] docorion.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 02:02 pm (UTC)(link)
As Ron notes, I actually do understand concern about mass vaccination programs in general; their history in recent years is checkered, at best.

But misrepresenting a voluntary program as mandatory goes well over the line of concern into scare tactics seemingly designed to *mis*-inform. An odd thing for a libertarian group to do.

[identity profile] srakkt.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)
There are probably reasonable arguments to be made in support of the concept of mandatory vaccination. I'm not saying that I support this concept wholesale, or even in this instance, only that the nature of vaccinations and herd immunity make the argument a reasonable one to have - but not now or here.

There are other parts of the MassLPA letter which are certainly dishonest and border on being outright falsehood, specifically the part about neurological disorders. The reference here is to Guillain-Barré - which has nothing at all to do with the H1N1 vaccine. It is triggered in susceptible persons by immune response, ANY immune response, including the sort of immune respones one has when one is actually sick, rather than the engineered immune response which is the intention of every vaccine. The assertion that they seem to be making is along the lines of the people claiming that there is a "controversy" over Gardasil (the HPV vaccine) because of the eighteen reported deaths in the study, which demonstrably and provably had absolutely nothing at all to do with the vaccine, but which MUST be reported.

As for the assertion that some shadowy pharmaceutical conspiracy is at work, here, well... You're clearly beginning your reasoning from a set of predicates I don't share. Arguing about that would not be particularly constructive.

[identity profile] rozasharn.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 05:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Please note: even with mandatory vaccinations, people can still opt out. Christian Scientists routinely refuse vaccinations, and this is legal. The point of 'mandatory' designations is that insurance programs are legally required to cover those vaccines. This is to make sure that everyone who wants the vaccine can afford it.

[identity profile] joylewis.livejournal.com 2009-08-26 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
It's interesting. I'm in nursing school and we are told often that public and private schools require students and faculty to be vaccinated (unless they can provide a religious or medical reason why not.) We were also told that this H1N1 vaccine would be mandatory for the same reasons (not just for us as medical workers, but for kids in elementary school, too.)

They also said that the most severely affected population is 5-18. Anyone else have data on that? I'll be working in pediatrics in September and October, which is said to be the worst time for exposure.

[identity profile] smeetie.livejournal.com 2009-08-30 12:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I was at this meeting yesterday and they said it was 5-24.

[identity profile] hissilliness.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 02:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I was not impressed with the original post, for pretty much the standard reasons, but this is a gracious response, and much appreciated.

[identity profile] agnosticoracle.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 01:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Accuracy is not a core value for anti-vaxors. But we should cut them some slack, it isn't like they are advocating something that will kill people. Oh hold on...

[personal profile] ron_newman 2009-08-25 01:55 pm (UTC)(link)
To be fair, there were serious problems with a previous mass swine flu vaccination program in 1976, which may have cost more lives than it saved. Vigilance is appropriate, but intentionally misleading alarmism is not.
Edited 2009-08-25 13:57 (UTC)

[identity profile] agnosticoracle.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 02:07 pm (UTC)(link)
During a typical year in the United States, 30,000 to 50,000 persons die of flu. The serious problem in 1976 you are referring to is Guillain-Barré Syndrome. There were about 500 cases of flu vaccine related Guillain-Barré Syndrome in 1976, only 25 of which resulted in death.
Edited 2009-08-25 14:08 (UTC)

[identity profile] srakkt.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 02:11 pm (UTC)(link)
And worth noting: in the intervening years, we've learned how to better treat cases of Guillain-Barré.

As for what to call the movement, I prefer to call them "Pro-Diseasers".

[identity profile] agnosticoracle.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 02:23 pm (UTC)(link)
hehe. They are working hard to save measles and whooping cough from extinction.

[personal profile] ron_newman 2009-08-25 02:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Which reminds me of this article from Atlantic Monthly a few years back:

Bucking the Herd: Parents who refuse vaccination for their children may be putting entire communities at risk

It's about a whooping cough epidemic in Boulder, Colorado (a community with some cultural and political similarity to Somerville), where too many people decided not to vaccinate.
Edited 2009-08-25 14:28 (UTC)

[identity profile] agnosticoracle.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 02:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I tend to think of anti-vaxors (pro-disease) folks being the liberal equivalent of creationists. Both reject science in favor of conspiracy theories.

[personal profile] ron_newman 2009-08-25 02:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks. Does the CDC know why this particular vaccine caused the syndrome, when other regular seasonal flu vaccines did not?

[identity profile] docorion.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)
The seasonal ones do cause GBS, about a case or two per million doses (reference: WHO H1N1 vaccine fact sheet (http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/frequently_asked_questions/vaccine_preparedness/safety_approval/en/index.html)). (And the random incidence of GBS due to random infections is about 1 in 100,000, sayeth the the fact sheet from NINDS (http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/gbs/detail_gbs.htm)) The '76 swine flu vaccine caused about 10 times the number from routine flu vaccinations, which is why they were pulled. And they still haven't figured out why that happened, no. (Dammit).
Edited 2009-08-25 14:29 (UTC)

[identity profile] clevernonsense.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 02:25 pm (UTC)(link)
that press release is so full of crazy i wouldn't be surprised if this is just a rewrite of one of those emails debunked on snopes

[identity profile] genesayssitdown.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 02:57 pm (UTC)(link)
i had swine flu. it was great! they put me on steroids and i ate a colossal hungry person's breakfast at a diner, then drove angrily to new hampshire using only side roads. it took three and a half hours.

swine flu was great! and now i don't need no damned vaccination!

[identity profile] hrafn.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 03:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I can get $50 to show up?? Tell me more!

[identity profile] hrafn.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 04:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes.

Also, I thought it was probably BS, given the rest of the letter.

[personal profile] ron_newman 2009-08-25 04:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I can see how that happened. If you go to this event, I'd love to see a report-back.

[identity profile] genevra-mcneil.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 04:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm someone actually going to the meeting this Saturday, and I'm really excited about it. (You have your hobbies. Mine is emergency planning for worst-case-scenarios.) (http://paulmcneil.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/wednesday-oct-1-2008/)

There was a similar thread on the Somerville Moms list, complete with inflammatory nonsense and hysteria. Myself, I'd much rather go and listen to what the CDC has to say and offer them my feedback than march around outside with signs. They picked Somerville as one of only 10 cities in the US to have this sort of community meeting because of our staggering diversity.

I've got my own ideas -- I'm PRO vaccine, just so you know -- but if anyone has some ideas and opinions and can't make it, please feel free to email them to me at genevramcneil AT gmail DOT com.

[personal profile] ron_newman 2009-08-25 07:11 pm (UTC)(link)
It took a while before I realized what you were doing in that blog.

[identity profile] genevra-mcneil.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 07:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, we had a lead-in that took a little too long. You can skip the boring exposition and get right to the good (disastrous) stuff if you go to the Halloween entries. (http://paulmcneil.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/friday-oct-31-2008-5/) Remember, it was all written one year in advance, so some of our assumptions were ... uh... a little off.... (Hillary vs. Fred... blush)!

My strategy.

[identity profile] nvidia99999.livejournal.com 2009-08-25 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Make sure EVERYBODY ELSE gets vaccinated.

Re: My strategy.

[identity profile] enochs-fable.livejournal.com 2009-08-27 01:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Otherwise known as Not-In-My-Arm. Like NIMBY!