ext_87359 (
miss-chance.livejournal.com) wrote in
davis_square2009-12-16 10:29 am
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
A Poll About Air Traffic
I know matters are not this simple. Clearly it's not simply a question of either/or... but, as a sort of thought experiment, I'm curious how people here would feel about the following:
A few years ago Handscom Airforce Base in Concord started opening up to commercial traffic. There was a huge push-back, both from the residents of Concord, but also from those whose interest was in the Walden Pond State Reservation, and the Minuteman National Historical Park and Wildlife Refuge. But there are commercial flights out of there now, with increased road traffic to and from the airport, etc. Periodically their license to run commercial flights, and how many, will come up for review.
*If* it was a simple matter of this or that, which would you prefer?
(Radio Buttons, because, while yes, "it depends" and "neither" (or "both") are all valid points, for the purposes of a straight opinion poll, we'll push it to an either/or anyway.)
[Poll #1499801]
A few years ago Handscom Airforce Base in Concord started opening up to commercial traffic. There was a huge push-back, both from the residents of Concord, but also from those whose interest was in the Walden Pond State Reservation, and the Minuteman National Historical Park and Wildlife Refuge. But there are commercial flights out of there now, with increased road traffic to and from the airport, etc. Periodically their license to run commercial flights, and how many, will come up for review.
*If* it was a simple matter of this or that, which would you prefer?
(Radio Buttons, because, while yes, "it depends" and "neither" (or "both") are all valid points, for the purposes of a straight opinion poll, we'll push it to an either/or anyway.)
[Poll #1499801]
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
It's absolutely not a wildlife refuge
no subject
no subject
no subject
Even if it is already on the flowchart. (http://community.livejournal.com/davis_snark/49178.html)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Which would you prefer to see (hear) happen?
() Fewer complaints about airplane noise over Somerville/Medford
() Fewer complaintants about airplane noise over Somerville/Medford
I'm sorry, "It Depends" or "Neither" or "Both" aren't going to be options in this poll, even if you think they're options, but since I don't think that your opinion is valid, I won't let you make that opinion and therefore this poll will conclude in a valid scientific fact.
Noise Pollution
Re: Noise Pollution
Re: Noise Pollution
Re: Noise Pollution
Re: Noise Pollution
Re: Noise Pollution
Re: Noise Pollution
Re: Noise Pollution
no subject
That said, one argument against commercial flights at Handscom is that it reduces the total number of available slots for airplanes, thus increasing the total cost of flying and making rail seem more cost effective. But this may be offset by the fact that the airplanes from Handscom tend to fly over disproportionately wealthy towns and, by association, the towns most likely to make use of air travel in the first place. I don't find it particularly fair that most of the flights into Logan approach over Dorchester, a neighborhood that definitely uses less than its fair share of air travel in spite of all of the noise they have to deal with.
no subject
less noise for all, more jobs, everyone wins.
if only we had the money, and if only that were feasible.
while i'm dreaming i'd also like a new car and tv.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject