A Poll About Air Traffic
Dec. 16th, 2009 10:29 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I know matters are not this simple. Clearly it's not simply a question of either/or... but, as a sort of thought experiment, I'm curious how people here would feel about the following:
A few years ago Handscom Airforce Base in Concord started opening up to commercial traffic. There was a huge push-back, both from the residents of Concord, but also from those whose interest was in the Walden Pond State Reservation, and the Minuteman National Historical Park and Wildlife Refuge. But there are commercial flights out of there now, with increased road traffic to and from the airport, etc. Periodically their license to run commercial flights, and how many, will come up for review.
*If* it was a simple matter of this or that, which would you prefer?
(Radio Buttons, because, while yes, "it depends" and "neither" (or "both") are all valid points, for the purposes of a straight opinion poll, we'll push it to an either/or anyway.)
[Poll #1499801]
A few years ago Handscom Airforce Base in Concord started opening up to commercial traffic. There was a huge push-back, both from the residents of Concord, but also from those whose interest was in the Walden Pond State Reservation, and the Minuteman National Historical Park and Wildlife Refuge. But there are commercial flights out of there now, with increased road traffic to and from the airport, etc. Periodically their license to run commercial flights, and how many, will come up for review.
*If* it was a simple matter of this or that, which would you prefer?
(Radio Buttons, because, while yes, "it depends" and "neither" (or "both") are all valid points, for the purposes of a straight opinion poll, we'll push it to an either/or anyway.)
[Poll #1499801]
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 03:48 pm (UTC)Even if it is already on the flowchart. (http://community.livejournal.com/davis_snark/49178.html)
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 03:54 pm (UTC)Seriously, how is it useful? There is no data here, no real information, it is admittedly not a real reflection of anything whatsoever. Let's post another thought experiment: Would you rather yell at a baby or kick a kitten?
The other post wasn't useful, either, and I said so there as well, but at least it was only the first one of the day.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 05:30 pm (UTC)How is this even debatable?
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 06:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-17 02:28 am (UTC)They think I can't hear them laughing, but I can.