http://inkarn8.livejournal.com/ (
inkarn8.livejournal.com) wrote in
davis_square2013-02-26 02:49 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Skunk Smell Issue - Tenant or Landlord responsibility?
Does anyone know whether the tenant or Landlord would be responsible for cleaning up the smell of an apartment after a skunk has sprayed near or under a house? They skunk has already been evicted and barred from getting under the porch or house. It may still get into the yard. Some of the tenants are saying the house is "uninhabitable" per section 10 of the standard lease form and as such the landlord is totally responsible for cleaning, loss of wages, rent for that period etc. and more...
no subject
no subject
" It will not work for skunk spray that has drifted over a large area or is trapped in a house. Only time and adequate ventilation will help in this case."
http://users.humboldt.edu/wfwood/deodorize.shtml
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Since I'm getting the feeling that the OP is the landlord, I'd maybe offer the cleaning service fee you were pondering, and if they balk, pull out the counterclaim above.
It sucks for the tenants, but holding the landlord responsible for wildlife beyond reasonable repair, removal and prevention of future incursions is, in my legally ignorant opinion, excessive.
no subject
no subject
There is no indication, however, that the presence of an odor makes the premises unfit for habitation. You or your tenants can request an inspection, however, and the law is clear that it is not exhaustive, so you're not necessarily off the hook.
Here's the fine print: http://www.lawlib.state.ma.us/source/mass/cmr/cmrtext/105CMR410.pdf
Just remember that when in doubt, landlord-tenant law tends to be tilted towards helping the tenant. You can fight, but it's probably not worth the effort.
no subject
Suggestion: get a gallon of the skunk odor remover, dump it into a spray bottle, and spray everywhere near where it's worst. Open all windows and set some fans blowing towards the windows/doors. Hope for a couple of mild, clear days.
One note: the house is not "unlivable". The human nose will become accostomed to the scent, and while other people may smell it, the people involved won't be able to. So they'll be able to sleep, etc. Just shower a few times and launder and ask someone who doesn't live there to sniff you to ensure you're not accidentally too offensive. Also, about a week after the place is aired out, ask a friend with a good nose to give your house and belongings a "sniff test" to ensure that nothing remains.
Good work places will understand your issue, and besides some goodnatured jibes, it's no real disaster.
http://www.drsfostersmith.com/product/prod_display.cfm?pcatid=24505
edit: from my reading of emannths's link, the owner is responsible to keep the premises clear of skunks. This has been done, according to your original post. I didn't see anything in that document that says the owner is responsible for cleaning up the scent and/or "damage".
no subject
no subject
no subject
1] You're not responsible for loss of wages (the only exception would be if your tenants brought a civil suit and it was found that your negligence was responsible for the skunk getting in AND that the skunk getting in caused the tenants to lose their wages).
2] If the skunk sprayed under the house or under the porch, my inclination is to say that responsibility for cleanup may fall on you because those are common areas and within the footprint of the house, but another lawyer might think differently.
3] An odor can in fact be a breach of the implied warranty of habitability, which means that the landlord is responsible for getting rid of it and can be held liable if she doesn't, but it isn't necessarily a breach: It would depend whether the source of the odor was something under your control, whether you tried to get rid of the odor, and how long it lasted (and probably how bad it was). Tenants can withhold rent on the basis of breaches of the implied warranty of habitability, but I think something that lasts just a few days wouldn't count as a breach, especially if you took some steps to remedy it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
In other words, it seems to me that the city is ill-equipped to deal with situations of absentee owners who ignore these chronic problems (which is probably the case with the houses you're noticing). The system works pretty well with the average lazy but basically decent homeowner, who will pay the ticket and then at least try to fix the problem. But with a deadbeat owner, when it gets to the point where writing more and more tickets isn't changing anything, then what? The city seems not to have an answer to that one.
no subject