Ron Newman ([personal profile] ron_newman) wrote in [community profile] davis_square2014-11-05 11:21 pm
Entry tags:

ZBA approves Roche Bros. food market, defers action on Crunch Gym

The Zoning Board of Appeals tonight unanimously approved Roche Bros' proposal for a Brothers Marketplace food store on the first floor of 240 Elm Street, which housed a Social Security office until 2010.

They didn't seem so happy with the proposed Crunch Gym on the second floor, raising questions about how much additional traffic and parking demand the gym would bring to Davis Square. They deferred action on this until their next meeting on November 19.

[identity profile] she-of-emeralds.livejournal.com 2014-11-06 12:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Where exactly on Elm St. is this? (I don't know the street numbers, just the landmarks.)

[identity profile] teko.livejournal.com 2014-11-06 12:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Where the old Social Security building used to be, now a Dunkin' Donuts. Next to Diva, across from the former McDonalds.

[identity profile] she-of-emeralds.livejournal.com 2014-11-06 12:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Aha. Thank you!

[identity profile] teko.livejournal.com 2014-11-06 01:18 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a bit hard to tell from the floorplan how that'll work, at least, I'm having trouble envisioning it. I'm unclear if it's an in-store location (like the DD's in Super Stop & Shop) or a self-contained store that connects to and shares an entrance with the Market.

[identity profile] teko.livejournal.com 2014-11-06 12:42 pm (UTC)(link)
You can click here (http://www.somervillema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2014_1015-240ELMPlansChesterStUpdateElevation.pdf) to see the approved floorplan and outside elevations from the meeting.

[identity profile] keithn.livejournal.com 2014-11-06 05:11 pm (UTC)(link)
The zoning board is a complete farce. It's all about approving businesses that have connections and disapproving ones that don't, and the justifications given are nothing but transparent pretext.

"Questions about how much additional traffic and parking demand" the gym would bring to the area? Really? And the supermarket won't create this issue? Do you want to put something there that nobody will want to go to? Did you forget that Davis Square has T access?

And weren't these the same people questioning whether the gym could bring in enough customers to even stay in business? And they're worried that it will create too much traffic at the same time?

This is embarrassing for the city of Somerville. I wish we had a real choice when elections come around.
Edited 2014-11-06 17:12 (UTC)

[identity profile] teko.livejournal.com 2014-11-06 05:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Not to defend the zoning board, but another factor may be the uniqueness of the businesses. There's really nothing else like Brothers Market in the Square, whereas there's another large gym just a block away, as well as a yoga studio right across the street. Of course, they also let us hit critical mass on froyo places, so maybe not.

[identity profile] keithn.livejournal.com 2014-11-06 05:53 pm (UTC)(link)
If that was the case, then they should say so. But I wouldn't buy the argument anyway. Boston Sports Club is a luxury fitness center that costs $70 per month and $70 to even sign up. The Crunch! gym will have memberships ranging from $10-20 per month with initial fees of $40. There is plenty of value in having a low cost gym in Davis Square. I anticipate signing up when (if?) it opens.

[identity profile] teko.livejournal.com 2014-11-06 05:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I hadn't looked into Crunch. That sounds great, and I hope they get approved. I absolutely agree that a low-cost gym (a block from the T and a few steps from a bus stop) has a different audience than Boston Sports Club.

[identity profile] closetalker11.livejournal.com 2014-11-13 05:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, agreed, for all those reasons. I would absolutely join that gym.

[identity profile] purgatori84.livejournal.com 2014-11-08 05:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I would love a lower-cost gym in Davis as well (that isn't RocknFitness / has windows)

[identity profile] mindstalk.livejournal.com 2014-11-06 06:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Parking requirements are a complete farce in themselves. Also, fiasco. Also, would basically make Davis Square -- well, most of Boston, Cambridge, and Somerville -- illegal and impossible if applied retroactively.

[identity profile] keithn.livejournal.com 2014-11-06 07:20 pm (UTC)(link)
When you reported "they didn't seem so happy with the proposed Crunch Gym on the second floor" I took that to mean that they were... well... unhappy with the Crunch Gym proposal, for the reasons you listed (traffic reasons). If they were OK with it, they would just issue a variance, as you just indicated. Could you clarify your original comments, because I feel like I'm not interpreting your words the way you meant.

[identity profile] surrealestate.livejournal.com 2014-11-08 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
Obviously they already allowed another gym in Davis, so the idea of a gym is okay. I also agree that they would serve a difference audience.

[identity profile] mindstalk.livejournal.com 2014-11-06 06:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Not like anyone would walk to a gym, especially with so man around! *cough*

[identity profile] bobobb.livejournal.com 2014-11-08 09:43 am (UTC)(link)
In total agreement. This is ridiculous.

[identity profile] gruene.livejournal.com 2014-11-07 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Someone forgot to tell Crunch to donate to the Mayor's campaign fund, it looks like.

[identity profile] pywaket.livejournal.com 2014-11-08 04:57 am (UTC)(link)
Comment of the day.

[identity profile] ronhaha108.livejournal.com 2014-11-08 10:59 am (UTC)(link)
Was there any mention of what's going into the old McDonalds at the ZBA?

[identity profile] closetalker11.livejournal.com 2014-11-13 05:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Well that sounds awesome!!!

[identity profile] miss-chance.livejournal.com 2014-11-11 06:25 am (UTC)(link)
Do you know if the Roche Bros. plan is contingent on them getting the Crunch Gym business for the other half (other floor) of the building? If the gym doesn't go through, do we lose the market, too? Or are they totally separate?
Edited 2014-11-11 06:26 (UTC)