http://keithn.livejournal.com/ (
keithn.livejournal.com) wrote in
davis_square2015-07-05 05:42 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Tenoch Mexican opening blocked by city
The City of Somerville, in their ongoing quest to turn Davis Square into a cluster of abandoned, crumbling buildings, is holding up the opening of Tenoch Mexican, acording to Tenoch's website:
From the City's records, this was what was considered by the Licensing Commission on June 15:
UPDATE: At the June 15, 2015 Somerville City Council meeting, Tenoch was not approved to open our new location at 382 Highland Ave in Davis Square. Come show your support for Tenoch at an informational meeting on Monday, July 13 from 6:30-7:30 at the future Tenoch location at 382 Highland Ave., or at the next Somerville hearing on Monday, July 20 at 6 pm at Town Hall, when we are on the docket again. Help us get our new place up and running and satisfy your torta craving in Davis Square!
From the City's records, this was what was considered by the Licensing Commission on June 15:
Tenoch Mexican Food Corporation d/b/a Tenoch Mexican, 382 Highland Ave. requesting approval for a Wine & Malt 7 Day Restaurant License, a Common Victualler License, an Entertainment License consisting of Entertainment by Performers and Devises and an Alteration of Premises
no subject
Alfresco was not a neighborhood nuisance.
M3 was not a neighborhood nuisance (though it was a nuisance to the landlord because of unpaid rent).
I think all of these had liquor licenses.
Going way back, Dolly's/Kay & Chips was a nuisance at times, but it did not have a liquor license. It was open mostly during hours when liquor cannot legally be served, anyway.
I see no "potential nuisance" basis to deny Tenoch a license.
no subject
Tenoch would be a huge addition to Davis Square.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
It would seem obvious that the reason for delay is not that the city is "blocking" them unfairly from opening this summer, or that the licensing commission is "clueless" and overly indulgent to "cranks" (the three commission members, two of whom are lawyers, have been doing this for an average of ten years each) but that the owners have not yet prepared the ground with their future neighbors. They now have a chance to do so on July 13 and to adjust their proposal accordingly.
no subject
no subject