Reason Behind the 48-hour Parking Rule
Dec. 27th, 2007 10:34 amThere has been some talk in this community about the 48-hour parking rule. Can someone explain the rationale behind this law? I have a car, but I take the "T" or ride my bike to work, so it doesn't make sense to me to have to move my car for no reason. I understand the need to move my car for street-sweeping, but this 48-hour thing doesn't seem to have a basis.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 03:51 pm (UTC)Now, this is a really stupid idea, thought up at least in part by people who drive a lot (as opposed to people who use public transit in town and use their cars as ancillary transportation), but that's the basis for it.
In winter its also used to make sure that people shovel out their cars, because you need to shovel it out in order to move it.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:13 pm (UTC)When this was an issue (when I was being penalized for taking the subway instead of driving to work), I would just move my car before getting onto the T a day or two after the snow storm.
I never got a ticket except for the times that there were the telltale snow ring around my car.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:14 pm (UTC)Somerville has about 80,000 people in four square miles of land. I have no idea how many of them have cars, but I know for a fact the city doesn't have enough parking; we've all dealt with the de facto one-way streets. The city has to force people to circulate their cars somehow, otherwise the parking situation would be even more drastic than it is.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:17 pm (UTC)It's not a good solution.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:24 pm (UTC)