Page Summary
plumtreeblossom.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ron_newman - (no subject)
nowalmart.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ron_newman - (no subject)
nowalmart.livejournal.com - (no subject)
warlord-mit.livejournal.com - (no subject)
icecreamempress.livejournal.com - (no subject)
somertricky.livejournal.com - (no subject)
elusiveat.livejournal.com - Why:
tomchampion.livejournal.com - Full Results
icecreamempress.livejournal.com - (no subject)
plumtreeblossom.livejournal.com - (no subject)
plumtreeblossom.livejournal.com - (no subject)
somertricky.livejournal.com - Re: Full Results
somertricky.livejournal.com - Re: Why:
elements.livejournal.com - (no subject)
elements.livejournal.com - (no subject)
somertricky.livejournal.com - (no subject)
zmgmeister.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fefie.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lena-a-mermaid.livejournal.com - (no subject)
elements.livejournal.com - (no subject)
elements.livejournal.com - PDF of full Dem results
zmgmeister.livejournal.com - (no subject)
gruene.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ourthermidor.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ourthermidor.livejournal.com - (no subject)
elements.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ron_newman - (no subject)
ron_newman - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Base style: Lefty by
- Theme: City Spring by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 02:36 pm (UTC)I voted for you, by the way.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 04:49 pm (UTC)Doing that will probably net her more voters than examining Biden's platform.
Florida in 2000, for example. Rather than simply complaining about Nader, the DNC should have realized "Hey, if we had convinced 600 voters to vote for us instead of Nader, we would have won. I wonder how we can reach out to those voters in 2004?"
Trying to get Kucinich voters (who might stay home in November) to come out and vote for the eventual Democratic candidate is easier than trying to sway a McCain voter to switch, as well.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 06:15 pm (UTC)Absentee? Perhaps the vote was cast before they dropped out?
no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 07:00 pm (UTC)Quick question: Why were ballots for the Working Families Party even printed up for yesterday? The entire ballot was a blank slate. It's small peanuts, but could you conceivably bill the WFP for the cost of printing those ballots?
Why:
Date: 2008-02-06 07:11 pm (UTC)Full Results
Date: 2008-02-06 07:16 pm (UTC)As for the Working Families Party, the party qualified for ballot status statewide and nine people in Somerville took WF ballots. The cost was unavoidable.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 07:53 pm (UTC)Thanks, "Working Families Party", for wasting city and state money! YOU'RE AWESOME!
no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 08:00 pm (UTC)Re: Full Results
Date: 2008-02-06 08:36 pm (UTC)Unintentional Comedy Scale: 8.3 out of 10.
Re: Why:
Date: 2008-02-06 08:39 pm (UTC)Fortunately, I had a reason to cast a "legit" vote yesterday.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 11:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 11:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 11:50 pm (UTC)That's interesting, it's not like any of the big guns from Group 1 (Trane, Ciampa, Jim Halloran, Liz Moroney, Rossetti, Harris) got shut out, rather the lesser-known individuals.
Are Trane and Heller going to kiss and make up? The tension at that first meeting could be palpable...
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 03:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 03:53 am (UTC)http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/primaries/mass_primary_dem_results_by_town/
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 04:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 06:28 am (UTC)PDF of full Dem results
Date: 2008-02-07 06:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 02:21 pm (UTC)1. It looks good for the community if everybody votes, because then politicians take an interest in what we want.
2. It encourages the pol who's dropped out to try again, and it lets his competition know that some people are attracted to the other guy's platform.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 03:58 pm (UTC)All the people from Group One who missed the cut were near the bottom of the list. Maybe they chose to order the list so that the better known people were on top, but it could also be that people just gave up scanning the names.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-09 05:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-09 05:31 am (UTC)