Date: 2008-09-09 11:25 pm (UTC)
I'm not an expert, but it appears that you don't have to pay anything.
I do know that it is the responsibility of the person who has the bark on their property to remove branches interfering with the neighboring homes. However, in your case it was you who "hired" this guy to do the job and not the "owners" of the tree. That in itself could put you in a big wrong since it isn't your tree. You or your landowner is supposed to get in contact with the tee "owner" about doing something about the tree.
If he is to bill someone it's the person who "hired" him, which is you. But if there was no contract he has no proof he was even the one who did the work. So it's pretty much his word against yours. I can understand him wanting some compensation for his work but he should have discussed that with your prior to him doing the work. But it was never brought up. If you feel you'd like to compensate him for his work, that is really up to you. If he pushes the matter it might make for an unfriendly situation but he was at fault for not bringing up the topic of compensation and a contract.

Like I said I'm not an expert, just someone who knws landowners who have had tree/neighbor situations just like this.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

davis_square: (Default)
The Davis Square Community

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 5th, 2025 08:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios