Somerville and Cambridge election results
Nov. 7th, 2008 08:53 pmSomerville election results are available on the city web site by ward (HTML) and by precinct (PDF).
All of the votes are pretty lopsided. You'll find no surprises here, except possibly for the two non-binding questions.
The confusingly-worded Question 4 regarding religious discrimination in Israel won, 9100-5542 (with 4431 blanks). Question 5, which proposed replacing the state legislature by an assembly of 100 randomly-chosen citizens, lost resoundingly, 3468-11415 (with 4090 blanks). (Edit: In Somerville, these were on the ballot only in Denise Provost's legislative district, which covers about half the city.)
Cambridge election results are here, though only as totals and not broken down by ward and precinct. They either didn't bother counting write-ins and blanks, or just didn't report them online. Part of Cambridge had the same non-binding Question 4 as Somerville, and it won there by 9668-3662. Another part of Cambridge had a different non-binding Question 4 regarding greenhouse gas emissions and renewable energy; that also won by a huge margin.
Besides President and US Senator, no other offices were contested in either city. Just a bunch of Democrats running unopposed for 1 US House seat, 8 Mass. House seats, 4 Mass. Senate seats, 2 Governor's Council seats, and Middlesex County Register of Probate.
All of the votes are pretty lopsided. You'll find no surprises here, except possibly for the two non-binding questions.
The confusingly-worded Question 4 regarding religious discrimination in Israel won, 9100-5542 (with 4431 blanks). Question 5, which proposed replacing the state legislature by an assembly of 100 randomly-chosen citizens, lost resoundingly, 3468-11415 (with 4090 blanks). (Edit: In Somerville, these were on the ballot only in Denise Provost's legislative district, which covers about half the city.)
Cambridge election results are here, though only as totals and not broken down by ward and precinct. They either didn't bother counting write-ins and blanks, or just didn't report them online. Part of Cambridge had the same non-binding Question 4 as Somerville, and it won there by 9668-3662. Another part of Cambridge had a different non-binding Question 4 regarding greenhouse gas emissions and renewable energy; that also won by a huge margin.
Besides President and US Senator, no other offices were contested in either city. Just a bunch of Democrats running unopposed for 1 US House seat, 8 Mass. House seats, 4 Mass. Senate seats, 2 Governor's Council seats, and Middlesex County Register of Probate.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 06:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 12:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 02:17 pm (UTC)All 21 precincts had equal population when they were last redrawn after the 2000 census. Maybe populations have greatly shifted since then, or else some precincts have many more non-voters (children, non-citiizens, students registered in their home state) than others.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 02:33 pm (UTC)But if all 21 precincts have roughly equal populations, why were there such long lines at some precincts? Staffing issues? Problems with the scanners? Inadequate locations?
I e-mailed the Board of Elections Tuesday and received no response.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 02:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 09:23 pm (UTC)Meanwhile, almost all my co-workers reported little or no waiting at their polling places in other towns -- even when they got there at peak times before work. So, there must be some other explanation at work as well.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 03:41 pm (UTC)I vote in ward 7, precinct 3 and did not see questions 4 & 5 on my ballot -- were they and "all-Somerville" vote? Limited to certain wards?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 09:31 pm (UTC)I sent the Trickettes and their friend over to J.P. Licks for ice cream once the line turned the corner from Winslow to College (they handled themselves commendably, crossing at the light and returning all the change), and all three returned and finished with their scoops well before we got into the courtyard of Ciampa Manor, nevermind inside to vote.
I can't help but to think we've got some pokey poll workers in 6-2(compared to my old voting digs in 6-3), but WTFDIK?