[identity profile] anomie666.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] davis_square
Does anyone know where I could find the regulations governing crossing guards? Is it something regulated by the State or the town? My google-fu isn't what it used to be.

This morning I was walking through Union Square and I saw a crossing guard dart out in front of traffic on a green light to hold up his "stop" sign to let adults cross the road. Cars had to quickly brake and I'm surprised there wasn't a traffic accident of some sort.

1) Crossing guards shouldn't stop the flow of traffic at green lights, right?

2) Where I grew up, crossing guards wouldn't even hold up their stop sign for adults. They were there to make sure that school age kids crossed the road safely. Only in Massachusetts have I routinely witnessed crossing guards concerned with adults crossing the intersection.

Hopefully it was just because today was brutally cold and he didn't want to wait for a red light.

Date: 2009-01-15 02:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badseed1980.livejournal.com
I believe that only cops can disrupt the flow of traffic against the lights, but I haven't checked that with regulations.

Date: 2009-01-15 02:47 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] ron_newman
If he's helping people get across the street quickly in frigid weather, that seems to me all to the good.

Date: 2009-01-15 02:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lac.livejournal.com
I always get crossed by Crossing Guards around here. I always thought it was a bit odd but I see it all the time. But, I am always at a light or crosswalk.
(deleted comment) (Show 2 comments)

Date: 2009-01-15 03:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dianamp04.livejournal.com
I've almost run over one of the previous crossing guards on Willow by the school several times because she's jumped in front of my car way before the kids/adults are anywhere NEAR the crosswalk. She'd walk in front of my car after I made the stop and was starting to cross the intersection. It really made me appreciate the nice old man who started after her. (during last year's school year, I haven't driven to work this school year)

Date: 2009-01-15 03:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jenskot.livejournal.com
A crossing guard in Cambridge did actually hold up his sign to let me pass (although it was at a red light), and that was pretty disconcerting. I've been jaywalking in the city since I was 12, give me some credit!
From: [identity profile] turil.livejournal.com
State law offers the not terribly helpful when it comes to what to do about pedestrians in the roadway when driving a car:

"Upon approaching a pedestrian who is upon the traveled part of any way and not upon a sidewalk, every person operating a motor vehicle shall slow down."
~ MGL Chapter 90: Section 14.

And then:

"When traffic control signals are not in place or not in operation the driver of a vehicle shall yield the right of way, slowing down or stopping if need be so to yield, to a pedestrian crossing the roadway within a crosswalk marked in accordance with standards established by the department of highways if the pedestrian is on that half of the traveled part of the way on which the vehicle is traveling or if the pedestrian approaches from the opposite half of the traveled part of the way to within 10 feet of that half of the traveled part of the way on which said vehicle is traveling."

So, according to my take on this, if someone is crossing the street in a crosswalk where there are signals being used, you legally have to slow down, but can legally hit them if you want.

But... according to MGL Chapter 90: Section 24G if you kill them while under the influence of any drugs or alchohol, it's automatically considered vehicular homicide, no matter where the pedestrian is in the roadway. And if you just seriously injure them while under the influence, you automatically get at least 2.5 years in jail (state) or 6 months in jail (local).

And if the pedestrian is a cow, horse, or "other draft animal" you legally have to stop immediately! and be nice to them, if they seem scared. (Again, from CH90, S14.)

Date: 2009-01-15 05:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jamiesquared.livejournal.com
I live near the school on Powder House and the crossing guard there always does this as does the other crossing guard 2 blocks down. In the mornings the guy used to stop traffic to let someone turn illegally on red...the no turn on red sign has been gone for awhile now though.

Date: 2009-01-15 05:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiositykt.livejournal.com
purely out of curiosity was this the guy at powderhouse sq. at broadway? Cause he does that all the time and it's really annoying.

Date: 2009-01-15 06:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] closetalker11.livejournal.com
I've had that happen to me, and I was equally uncomfortable with the situation.

cedar and highland

Date: 2009-01-15 11:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] by-lime.livejournal.com
The guard who stands on the corner of cedar and highland, just plain refuses to walk into the street at all, but that doesn't stop him from waving his stop sign indiscriminately. He caused more annoyance than good this morning when neither the kids trying to cross nor the driver knew who was being signaled. Um, hint: don't wave your stop sign from the opposite street corner.

Date: 2009-01-17 10:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sammka.livejournal.com
I don't know why it would be illegal as long as the state or municipality has authorized the crossing guard to do it. If there were a law it would most likely be a municipal ordinance.

Sometimes traffic patterns (or your priorities about traffic patterns) are different from what they usually are. It's a lot easier to put out a crossing guard in those cases than to keep using the light: the crossing guard is right there, on the ground, and can therefore adjust to what's actually going on at the intersection.

I used to work in DC and every day there were crossing guards at this busy intersection in the business district during rush hour, managing traffic and pedestrians. No schools or children anywhere around, so it's clear that the city intentionally put the crossing guards there to help adults cross the street. An authorized crossing guard could stop cars at a green light because that's the exact reason they were there: to override the traffic light system in light of actual traffic patterns at that moment in time. Disobeying the traffic guard was a moving violation (or jaywalking, if you were a pedestrian), regardless of what the light said. Those guards were not to be messed with. And I'm pretty sure it was the best system they could have had to manage that kind of volume of traffic/pedestrians.

If I were you I'd be annoyed at how the guard darted out, which is dangerous, but not at the guard's existence.

Profile

davis_square: (Default)
The Davis Square Community

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 11:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios