To take arms against a sea of phone books
Jan. 23rd, 2009 08:51 pmAldermen Gewirtz and Desmond, and simultaneously Aldermen White and Sullivan, have introduced measures to stem the flow of unwanted phone books (text below the cut). If you have an opinion about unwanted phone books, the My Somerville page is a good way to find out who your aldermen are and let them know.
| Order | By Ald. Gewirtz and Desmond, That City Solicitor draft an ordinance to curtail mass phone book distribution in the interest of the environment and the convenience of residents, and provide an advisory opinion about how to do this so that phone books are available upon request but are not littered on doorsteps of those who do not want them. |
| Order | By Ald. White and Sullivan, That a representative of the City Solicitor appear before this Board’s Committee on Legislative Matters to address regulating the non-mail distribution of advertising brochures and phone books. |
for more about this, read the earlier thread
Date: 2009-01-24 03:18 am (UTC)These orders are from yesterday's (Jan 22nd) Board of Aldermen meeting agenda (http://www.somervillema.gov/CoS_Content/documents/agenda/01-22-2009.pdf) (pdf).
I find the Gewirtz/Desmond order confusing. First, aren't the aldermen the legislators, so why would they ask the solicitor to draft legislation? Second, "to curtail mass phone book distribution" is completely vague. The White/Sullivan order is easier to understand. Unfortunately, neither order specifies a time-frame for action.
It would make a ton of sense for phonebooks to be optional.
I wonder how the aldermen came up with these ideas simultaneously and why in two pairs? Is this some coordinated strategy or just coincidence?
Re: for more about this, read the earlier thread
Date: 2009-01-24 04:34 am (UTC)Re: for more about this, read the earlier thread
Date: 2009-01-24 05:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-24 06:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-24 09:14 am (UTC)Re: for more about this, read the earlier thread
Date: 2009-01-24 12:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-24 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-24 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-24 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-24 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-24 03:54 pm (UTC)Instead they left SEVEN.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-24 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-24 04:24 pm (UTC)Map and Street View
no subject
Date: 2009-01-24 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-24 05:23 pm (UTC)is cause you may know somebody in a similar situation,
or you may be in a similar situation, and if your in a
situation like that there's only one thing you can do
and that's walk into the shrink wherever you are,
just walk in say "Shrink, You can get anything you want,
at Alice's restaurant.". And walk out.
You know, if one person, just one person does it they may think he's really sick and they won't take him.
And if two people, two people do it, in harmony, they may think they're both (impolite term for homosexuals) and they won't take either of them.
And three people do it, three, can you imagine, three people walking in singin a bar of Alice's Restaurant and walking out. They may think it's an organization.
And can you, can you imagine fifty people a day,I said
fifty people a day walking in singin a bar of Alice's Restaurant and
walking out. And friends they may thinks it's a movement.
Can't carry around a phone book
Date: 2009-01-24 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-24 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-24 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-24 09:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-25 11:09 pm (UTC)My home town never had phone books delivered (and this was pre-internet when they were quite important still) -- we just had a pile of them at the post office. I don't see how that's inconvenient for anyone who wants one.