another tedious parking post: 20 ft rule
Apr. 9th, 2010 08:48 pmOk - here's another tedious parking post.... (yeah yeah ;-)
Got TWO tickets for being within 20 feet of an intersection - on a street I have lived for 15 years - and in a spot I have parked and seen others park many, many times before. In the same general area there are also many little 'stub' parking spaces - where the space between a driveway and the corner/intersection is @ 12-15 feet - so that parking there would not be legal - yet with each one there is a parking sign there citing street cleaning, etc. - so those spaces appear to be legal but are apparently *not* legal, given the 20 foot rule, yet cars there don't get tagged.
I am happy to follow the rules (20 ft == fire engine clearance, etc) and pay the fines if I get them but I am having trouble knowing where the rules apply and where they don't. Parking enforcement seems increasingly arbitrary and capricious or what?? - based on the mood of the ticket person and whether or not they got laid the night before?
I know parking rants are... rants.... and this is also a rant - but I have lived on this same street for 15 years and I really can't tell any more where it it safe to park.
Definitely going to contest this and get my 5 minutes of rant time.
Got TWO tickets for being within 20 feet of an intersection - on a street I have lived for 15 years - and in a spot I have parked and seen others park many, many times before. In the same general area there are also many little 'stub' parking spaces - where the space between a driveway and the corner/intersection is @ 12-15 feet - so that parking there would not be legal - yet with each one there is a parking sign there citing street cleaning, etc. - so those spaces appear to be legal but are apparently *not* legal, given the 20 foot rule, yet cars there don't get tagged.
I am happy to follow the rules (20 ft == fire engine clearance, etc) and pay the fines if I get them but I am having trouble knowing where the rules apply and where they don't. Parking enforcement seems increasingly arbitrary and capricious or what?? - based on the mood of the ticket person and whether or not they got laid the night before?
I know parking rants are... rants.... and this is also a rant - but I have lived on this same street for 15 years and I really can't tell any more where it it safe to park.
Definitely going to contest this and get my 5 minutes of rant time.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 01:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 01:09 am (UTC)If they really care about keeping people from parking close to corners for safety reasons, they should PUT UP NO PARKING SIGNS!
Yes, that would cost money. But so does hiring meter maids to issue tickets. And it's the only way to actually fix the problem. With no signs, there will always be someone who doesn't know the rule, or mis-estimates 20 feet, and park where the city doesn't want them to. If they put up signs, the rule is no longer a secret, and nobody has to whip out a measuring tape.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 01:29 am (UTC)Yes.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 01:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 01:41 am (UTC)i really don't want my default attitude toward city government to be disgust and contempt, but they're working really hard to push me that way. :(
how's that for a rant?
no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 01:50 am (UTC)Looks like the car was blocking the pedestrian ramp, and they needed to mark the crosswalk.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 01:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 02:01 am (UTC)+1
Date: 2010-04-10 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 02:55 am (UTC)They apply, in all cities and town in MA, within 20 feet of any intersection.
The city has repeatedly said they will NOT mark it - either with paint or signs.
So don't hold your breath.
Awwwww!
Date: 2010-04-10 03:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 04:08 am (UTC)Re: Awwwww!
Date: 2010-04-10 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 04:25 am (UTC)Re: Awwwww!
Date: 2010-04-10 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 12:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 12:23 pm (UTC)I brought this up when they said they were going sign the entire city as permit only - I got deafening silence.
Re: Awwwww!
Date: 2010-04-10 01:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 01:42 pm (UTC)The rules exist of a reason. Please follow them.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 05:13 pm (UTC)Re: Awwwww!
Date: 2010-04-10 07:31 pm (UTC)there is actual confusion here, i.e., a sign insinuating you can park there as long as you have a permit but also possibly conflicting with the 20' rule. not 'i know what i did was totally illegal, but my heart was in the right place! plus, i don't wanna pay!'
no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 08:59 pm (UTC)- There's no laws in Massachusetts to give them any legal meaning. (The same is true in NYS, and NYC even goes so far as to tell people to ignore painted curbs, since they're all unofficial, and therefore don't actually tell you where it's legal or illegal to park.)
- Snow
no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-10 10:18 pm (UTC)Re: +1
Date: 2010-04-11 12:37 pm (UTC)The compromise was to have the Fire Chief designate the worst intersections (where parking too close to the makes it especially hard to bring a fire engine) and designate them as "Fire Lanes", and putting up signs.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-12 03:18 pm (UTC)What's wrong with painting the curb?Oh hey duh, somebody else answered this just below. Never mind.no subject
Date: 2010-04-13 09:16 pm (UTC)And what law is it that says towns can't paint curbs, except white paint in fire lanes? I've never seen that law.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-13 09:31 pm (UTC)Do you have a citation for the state law? If not, I think it's safe to assume it's just a collection of individual city/town regulations.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-13 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-13 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-13 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-13 09:57 pm (UTC)Regardless - if you got your license in MA, or converted an out of state license to an MA license, part of that process was to say you knew what was in the manual.
You cannot claim ignorance of that which you affirmed you knew, and that manual DOES say "no parking within 20 feet of an intersection".
If you have a Somerville permit, you AGAIN affirmed you knew what the Somerville laws were regarding parking, to include the "no parking within 20 feet of an intersection" law.
The Massachusetts Amendments to the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices recommends all cities adopt the "no parking within twenty (20) feet of an intersecting way" standard.
How can you claim ignorance of that which you have positively affirmed knowledge of, TWICE?
no subject
Date: 2010-04-14 04:47 pm (UTC)I was just disputing the claim that it's a state law, which would mean the city couldn't change it in situations where it might make sense, as Ron Newman suggested.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-14 04:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-14 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-14 04:56 pm (UTC)