Waiting for the 89 that never came
Oct. 31st, 2011 01:19 pmWhen I got to the Davis Square T this past Saturday, I waited awhile for the 89 that was supposed to come at 5:08pm because it lets me off close to where I live, rather than having to walk 15 minutes during the snow storm had I taken the 88. It never came. I called someone nearing 6pm to ask if they could look up with the Next Bus application when the 89 would actually arrive, which turned out to be at 6:08pm. The 89 bus scheduled to arrive at 5:08 on this snowy day wasn't late--it just never came.
I finally saw an MBTA official and asked them what was going on. They gave me a number to call. I called the number and followed the prompts to register a comment/complaint, but no one picked up. I called a second time. No one picked up. The next time I called, I pressed 1 rather than 3, which was for bus fare information. I told the person I called that I'd tried calling and registering a complaint, twice, but that no one picked up until I called and pressed 1. He said a couple of things that seemed to contradict--the first was that someone should be there to pick up until 8pm, and the second was that there were about 10 folks in the office and they picked up all of the calls. So. That leaves the question: why did no one pick up twice in a row? No real response.
With regard to what happened with the bus, after waiting on hold for a bit, I was told there was a mechanical failure, and that it would have been an hour before they could have sent another one, so they just waited until the next hourly 89 was supposed to come. And I am left wondering, as I saw at least 4 87 buses, and several 88s, pass in the time that I was waiting, why couldn't one of the more frequent routes take on the 89 route rather than make us wait for hours, wondering when the next one would come, when we could choose between standing inside the warmer station and be accosted by the smell of pee (I guess maybe it's worse when it's snowing and folks try to wait it out inside? Or maybe it just became more pronounced because I was there for so long, I don't know) or outside in the snow storm? Or walk home in the storm. Or take a cab. Goodness, could someone not have communicated to the person on call at the Davis Square station that they should at *least* make an announcement?
It was suggested that I call the MBTA and register a complaint. I did that once, years ago, and got something in the mail a little less than a year later that said my complaint had been registered and someone would get back to me when it was (which, need I say? NEVER HAPPENED). I have been told since that there are folks who are actually there to respond to you now and give a call back. Hoping someone might answer me today since it is a weekday during business hours, I just called and did, in fact, talk to someone, who took down my complaints about how this was handled and told me to expect a call back. Anyone here done that? Do they actually call back? And if they do, is there anything they do to explain how the problem is being considered, or do they just rely on the "well, sometimes we have breakdowns and that's that" excuse?
I finally saw an MBTA official and asked them what was going on. They gave me a number to call. I called the number and followed the prompts to register a comment/complaint, but no one picked up. I called a second time. No one picked up. The next time I called, I pressed 1 rather than 3, which was for bus fare information. I told the person I called that I'd tried calling and registering a complaint, twice, but that no one picked up until I called and pressed 1. He said a couple of things that seemed to contradict--the first was that someone should be there to pick up until 8pm, and the second was that there were about 10 folks in the office and they picked up all of the calls. So. That leaves the question: why did no one pick up twice in a row? No real response.
With regard to what happened with the bus, after waiting on hold for a bit, I was told there was a mechanical failure, and that it would have been an hour before they could have sent another one, so they just waited until the next hourly 89 was supposed to come. And I am left wondering, as I saw at least 4 87 buses, and several 88s, pass in the time that I was waiting, why couldn't one of the more frequent routes take on the 89 route rather than make us wait for hours, wondering when the next one would come, when we could choose between standing inside the warmer station and be accosted by the smell of pee (I guess maybe it's worse when it's snowing and folks try to wait it out inside? Or maybe it just became more pronounced because I was there for so long, I don't know) or outside in the snow storm? Or walk home in the storm. Or take a cab. Goodness, could someone not have communicated to the person on call at the Davis Square station that they should at *least* make an announcement?
It was suggested that I call the MBTA and register a complaint. I did that once, years ago, and got something in the mail a little less than a year later that said my complaint had been registered and someone would get back to me when it was (which, need I say? NEVER HAPPENED). I have been told since that there are folks who are actually there to respond to you now and give a call back. Hoping someone might answer me today since it is a weekday during business hours, I just called and did, in fact, talk to someone, who took down my complaints about how this was handled and told me to expect a call back. Anyone here done that? Do they actually call back? And if they do, is there anything they do to explain how the problem is being considered, or do they just rely on the "well, sometimes we have breakdowns and that's that" excuse?
no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 05:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 07:08 pm (UTC)Unfortunately the T is not very good at doing last-minute swaps.
"could someone not have communicated to the person on call at the Davis Square station that they should at *least* make an announcement?"
I've never seen a subway station agent make an announcement about a service delay, especially a bus delay. They're not set up to communicate such information to them.
A bus inspector (T-speak for supervisor) would be the one to do this, but I don't think there's one regularly on duty at Davis.
And something else I found out the hard way: Dispatch only gets in touch with station bus inspectors by landline phone. (Presumably inspectors have some sort of radio when they're driving their SUVs.) So if the inspector doing anything besides sitting in the booth by the phone, such as dealing with a problem on a bus right outside the booth, they'll miss the call.
I agree that it would be nice if they could make swaps and get the word out about problems, but the reality is that the T is not set up to do it.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 07:21 pm (UTC)Online form
Date: 2011-10-31 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 08:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 08:46 pm (UTC)No, but seriously, there's a strong argument that AHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Sorry. I just can't.
Is that really not a rhetorical question?
It's always been done this way. The job descriptions are part of contracts and can't be rewritten. Nobody's got money for 2-way radios, which probably wouldn't work that well anyway.
There's no funding. There's no political will. The right blames the unions. The unions blame lack of funding. Everyone blames the Big Dig and the Turnpike Authority.
Any attempt to raise funding is met by howls of opposition from Western Mass, which sees all the transit money poured into the gaping maw of the $4 billion dollar maintenance backlog of the T, and not into the gaping maw of the $4 billion dollar maintenance backlog of the transit systems outside of 495.
Grabauskas could fix the RMV, but he couldn't fix the T. New Commissioner Whatshisname actually got stuck on a broken-down train going to speak at a conference about train maintenance.
Anyone else?
no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 10:33 pm (UTC)I'm not completely cynical; for specific complaints, especially about unusual circumstances, they've actually been pretty good about responding to me and fixing things and so forth. For complaints about systematic problems, though... good luck with that.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 10:36 pm (UTC)Re: Online form
Date: 2011-10-31 10:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 11:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 11:26 pm (UTC)I've always thought that the "get a free ride if your bus is more than half an hour late" was ridiculous. A free $1.50 ride doesn't make up for the kindergartener whose mother is late picking her up, or for the job lost because the employee is late *again.* The only way Boston is ever going to deal with traffic and pollution and crumbling roadways is to *first* make public transit reliable.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-01 12:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-01 02:12 am (UTC)My other peeve is that the 86 is supposed to have bike racks, which I use when I take that route; However, 20% of the runs don't have the racks and they won't let me put my bike inside the bus, which I can understand, but how can one plan without the info? I was told that they ran out of funding 80% into the project. I wish the bus tracker services could note if the specific bus has a bike rack..
no subject
Date: 2011-11-01 02:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-01 02:55 am (UTC)Also, what's up with there being a scheduled detour and NO notices on the bus on the days leading up to the detour, or signs at the bus shelters? I guess you really have to check mbta.com EVERY time you plan on taking a bus, in case there's a secret detour.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-01 03:32 pm (UTC)Several bus systems out there (one in Christchurch, NZ, for example) have little plastic boxes by their bus stops. They have a bunch of LEDs that light up and show you, depending on which button you press, a) how long before the next bus, and b) how long before the next bus to a specific destination. This sort of system, plugged into NextBus, would be fantastic.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-01 05:50 pm (UTC)It's not listed at http://www.mbta.com/templates/popup_help.asp?eid=19424 . Though that page has no date, so there's no way of knowing how current it is.
There used to be a bike symbol on the schedules of routes on that list, but not any more.
It would be nice if all of the long routes and routes where biking isn't allowed had racks. (Hello 111 -- why the heck isn't that on the list, when there's no other way to get a bike to Chelsea without going miles out of your way?)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-01 05:57 pm (UTC)Also, http://www.mbta.com/riding_the_t/bikes/ says they relaxed the rules for bikes on the Blue Line. They're now allowed in the reverse-peak direction, and the peak restriction is shortened to 7-9 am and 4-6 pm. I'm surprised I didn't hear about this, since I try to keep track of this stuff. (The Red and Orange lines ban bikes in both directions from 7-10 am and 4-7 pm.)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-02 12:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-02 12:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 06:27 pm (UTC)