Now I'm not saying it's the best library in the world, but cutting funding isn't the answer. Somerville spends 0.96% of our budget on libraries. We could close them all down and it wouldn't be a drop in the bucket. Instead we need more, better libraries -- especially when times are tight and people are out looking for new skills and new jobs. Boston founded one of the first free public libraries in the world nearly 400 years ago. They're key to who we are as a people. Somerville will not lead the charge to end them.
If you agree, here's what you can do:
- Show up TONIGHT at City Hall at 6PM. Here's directions from Davis Square -- it's a 10 minute bus ride. Bring a sign or wear something red so we can find each other. Don't use your library voice. (And put the January 30th public hearing in your calendar now -- same time, same place, same color.)
- Call Mayor Curtatone's office: 617-625-6600. Tell him to get to work now on a plan that increases library funding, not cuts it. It won't take many calls to make a difference, and it's the best two minutes you'll spend all week. (When you call, you have to say "mayor's office," and then you have to insist on speaking with a real person. They'll tell you to email mayor@somervillema.gov, which is a good second option but not good enough.)
- Email, Facebook, Twitter. Not everyone reads Livejournal, but if we all tell ten friends we'll have an army.
UPDATE: Response from Mayor Curtatone's office pasted below.
UPDATE 2: Results of last night's meeting below.
UPDATE 3: The West Branch is safe under a new deal struck between the mayor and the firefighters!
| January 17, 2012 |
I wanted to bring your attention to a situation going on at city hall right now that could deeply impact our neighborhood. Last month, the city and the firefighters union entered into arbitration at the Joint Labor Management Committee (JLMC) since they couldn't agree on a contract for the past five years. The JLMC ruled in favor of a compromise salary increase for the firefighters. The mayor presented a plan, as he is required to do by the JLMC, to fund the award at the Board of Aldermen (BOA) meeting on 1/12. The mayor's plan calls for large scale layoffs and the closing of the West Branch Public Library. Closing the library is not an option, and I am fighting to prevent this. The Board of Aldermen can't change the plan, we can only vote it up or down. But there is a solution. At the BOA meeting on the 12th, the president of the firefighter union offered to make a concession, and have the award paid out over two years. This could potentially prevent the city from having to make these sorts of layoffs or the closing of the library. I sponsored a resolution asking the mayor to come back to the BOA with a plan to fund the award over two years instead of one. The resolution passed unanimously on a roll call vote. There will be a series of meetings to discuss the contract award and its funding starting this coming Wednesday night, 1/18 at city hall at 6pm and a PUBLIC HEARING on January 30th at City Hall at 6pm. All are welcome to attend all meetings. Please make your voice heard on this important issue and do not hesitate to be in touch with me. Best wishes, Rebekah Rebekah Gewirtz Ward 6 Alderman, Somerville |
UPDATE:
-----------------------------------------------------
UPDATE 2: January 18 Finance Committee meeting.
Progress last night
OK, the big news is that we showed up last night to be counted. On a cold Wednesday night with less than eight hours' notice, ten to twenty people came to be seen in support of our libraries. That might not sound like much, but for a Finance Committee meeting that no one, but no one, was supposed to pay attention to, it's a big deal, and it's going to make an impact. Thanks to everyone who came out (especially the kids!).
The practical thing we learned at the meeting is that the mayor and the union have gone back to the negotiating table to try to find a deal that won't lead to such drastic cuts. This is good news, but we won't know how good until we hear the new deal. We need to keep the pressure up, and definitely be ready to flood the meeting on January 30th.
Nitty-gritty details
If you're interested in the procedure (and maybe this is just me), here's what's going on: the state's Joint Labor Management Committee is what it sounds like, an arbitration committee with representatives of labor and management that resolves disputes between police and fire unions and cities. This is because police and fire can't exactly go on strike, so they need some other way to make cities negotiate for fair pay. In this case the JLMC unanimously decided that the City owes firefighters 2-3% yearly raises going all the way back to 2007. That's barely more than a cost-of-living raise, and in a perfect world we'd all get raises like that, but it adds up to a fair chunk of money.
When the mayor gets a JLMC decision, under St. 1987, ch. 589, s. 4A(3)(a), he has to submit it to the Aldermen within 30 days and recommend that they pay it. (It's up to him how to pay it, of course, and there's politics about whose ward it comes out of. Make a note never to fight City Hall if you can help it.) We get fined if he makes any kind of suggestion to anyone that it shouldn't be paid, so he's understandably not saying much. But the Aldermen are free to simply reject the proposal, and as far as I can tell all that happens is the mayor and union have to go back to the drawing board. (There might be other consequences, but they're not in that act.)
The good news is (as we can see) the mayor doesn't just have to support this plan. At the same time he supports it, he can also go back to the firefighters and say, hey, this plan sucks, let's cut a new deal. That's what seems to be happening behind the scenes now. If they come to a new deal, than the current proposal will be killed, we'll enter a new contract and move on. (I'm not clear what the exact steps are in killing the current proposal, but it seems like maybe the Aldermen would just never bring it up for a vote and no one would complain.)
If you're really, really interested in the details, you can see the mayor's proposal and video of the Finance Committee meeting here. (This is actually amazing service. Sometimes Somerville is pretty awesome.)
What comes next
Maybe they'll come up with a new plan that doesn't involve library cuts, and maybe they won't. We need to assume they won't, and plan to show up in force on January 30. Just a few phone calls between now and then could save us from even getting that far. Please take the 2 minutes.
But in the long term, as "intuition_ist" said below, we need to start paying attention to libraries before it becomes a crisis. Our city government simply doesn't take libraries seriously right now. I don't have numbers yet, but the West Branch cut would be at least a 20% slash to the library budget. When the mayor says he's planning cuts "not only at the Library, but also at DPW, 311, my office, SomerStat, the Fire Dept, the Police Dept. (non-officer positions), Recreation, Finance, Veteran’s Services and the Office of Strategic Planning and Community Development," do you think he's talking about a 20% cut to all those departments? I doubt it. (I'll happily let you know if they tell me I'm wrong.)
Our libraries are considered expendable, and we need to make it clear that they are not. Strong libraries are core to strong cities. If the mayor wants a tax base to pay for fire and police five years from now, he needs to support libraries today. It's the cheapest win in the budget.
I'm not an expert on this stuff; I found out it was such a problem literally yesterday. I'm hoping there are people doing great work on it we can support. If you want to stay updated, you can drop me a line at somervilleneedslibraries@gmail.com, or follow Support Somerville Libraries on Facebook, and I'll pass along what I find out.
Update 3: West Branch will stay open!
As of 5PM today (1/19), the mayor and the firefighters have cut a deal that avoids layoffs and closures for now. Here's the press release. If I'm reading this right, it seems to involve the union deferring about $400,000 until next year, and giving up another $600,000 in exchange for raises locked in for the next three years. Since the City needed to make $1.9 million in cuts before, this should be a lot easier (until next year anyway).
So we can call off the alarm for now. But we'll have to keep reminding the City this isn't the place to cut corners. Let's pay attention when the next budget comes around, and see what we can do to take care of the West Branch in the meantime. Let me know if you want to get together to brainstorm.
Also, since this all started with Rebekah Gewirtz's email, here's her wrapup. Sounds like she's looking for volunteers: