Nextdoor.com
May. 14th, 2012 10:13 amHello community-minded people! I wanted to pass along word of a new site, nextdoor.com, that's trying to build social networks out of neighborhoods. Here is a New York Times article about it.
You need at least ten verified residents of a neighborhood to sign up within 21 days to get it going. The areas they mark as neighborhoods are smaller chunks than we're used to thinking in -- there are probably at least six surrounding "Davis Square".
Here are the neighborhoods for Cambridge:
https://nextdoor.com/find-neighborhood/ma/cambridge/
and Somerville:
https://nextdoor.com/find-neighborhood/ma/somerville/
The only one that I know for sure has gotten started is Powderhouse.
(I have no affliation with Nextdoor -- I just think it would be cool to have more of these functioning for our area.)
Edit: Since my house is on the border of their Spring Hill and Powderhouse neighborhoods, in last night's repeated attempts to sign up I volunteered to get Spring Hill rolling. As part of that, I was invited to define the borders of "Spring Hill". So apparently if you're the first to get the ball rolling on a neighborhood, you get to say where it is. I didn't actually end up doing that, as they then fixed the bug that was preventing me from joining Powderhouse. ;-)
You need at least ten verified residents of a neighborhood to sign up within 21 days to get it going. The areas they mark as neighborhoods are smaller chunks than we're used to thinking in -- there are probably at least six surrounding "Davis Square".
Here are the neighborhoods for Cambridge:
https://nextdoor.com/find-neighborhood/ma/cambridge/
and Somerville:
https://nextdoor.com/find-neighborhood/ma/somerville/
The only one that I know for sure has gotten started is Powderhouse.
(I have no affliation with Nextdoor -- I just think it would be cool to have more of these functioning for our area.)
Edit: Since my house is on the border of their Spring Hill and Powderhouse neighborhoods, in last night's repeated attempts to sign up I volunteered to get Spring Hill rolling. As part of that, I was invited to define the borders of "Spring Hill". So apparently if you're the first to get the ball rolling on a neighborhood, you get to say where it is. I didn't actually end up doing that, as they then fixed the bug that was preventing me from joining Powderhouse. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 02:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 03:05 pm (UTC)Edit: Here's the FAQ answer from Maponics: "There are multiple sources for the neighborhood data including real estate agents, municipal records, local residents and other public and private resources. We also use feedback from our customers to validate boundaries and make improvements."
no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 03:11 pm (UTC)Google maps shows the same boundaries that maponics uses.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 03:44 pm (UTC)Also, do you consider the Armory to be part of the 'Powderhouse' neighborhood? I sure don't!
no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 04:45 pm (UTC)(Of course, I'm perfectly willing to call my neighborhood "Tufts" when ordering a 6-pack of cookies delivered by bike to the Tufts campus ;-)
no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 04:49 pm (UTC)Given their sources of information, though, I'm guessing that "real estate agents" probably have something to do with the skew seen here - i.e. certain desirable-sounding squares/neighborhoods that get billed as "nearby" or even treated as if the address was within its boundaries.
I also wonder if they were aiming for roughly equal divisions in each "neighborhood", such as in number of housing units - perhaps for database management reasons. Hence the miniscule Ten Hills neighborhood gets expanded (and has a better chance of getting enough people signed up to make it a viable neighborhood unit on this site), while Winter Hill gets shrunk and nudged southward into more debatable neighborhood boundaries. The skew there is so exaggerated that even the summit of Winter Hill itself is left out of its own neighborhood!
What a hoot. Whatever the rationale, the clumsy redefinition of neighborhood boundaries might even turn enough people off from using it to do them more harm than good, in terms of getting lots of people to use it. Personally, I feel as though these 'neighborhoods' are far too large anyway to fit most peoples' ideas of how many streets/doors someone can live from you and still be thought of as your neighbor. If they were thinking in terms of groupings that'd be likely to host an informal and neighborly-welcoming Block Party to encourage knowing your neighbors, the idea might seem more naturally applicable to an online version of that community grouping.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 08:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 10:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-14 11:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-15 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-15 02:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-15 08:39 pm (UTC)