Date: 2012-05-31 03:38 pm (UTC)
The cost of putting in a handful of pedestrian overpasses is trivial compared to the cost of a vehicle overpass. Pedestrian underpasses would be more expensive than overpasses, but still low cost compared to the flyway.

---

Highland and Somerville Ave are poor comparisons. They are not major arteries into Boston, and with a few exceptions (e.g. Somerville in Union Square) for the supermajority of their lengths' they are one-lane-each-direction. Highland is primarily residential with some mixed use and Somerville has sections of residential with primarily mixed use.
Broadway is also not a major artery, mostly mixed use, and while it is mostly 2-lanes-each-direction from Winter Hill to points east, those are the worst parts to cross.
Mass Ave is an artery, but let's be honest: any argument about Boston traffic that relies on Mass Ave's behavior is inherently flawed.
For the relevant portions, all of those roads have (posted or legally de-facto) speed limits of 30 MPH or lower.

McGrath (and Rt 28 in general) is a limited access road, a major artery into Boston, has very few businesses with direct access to the road (rather than via a side-lane or side street), and speed limits over 35 MPH. If you're looking for comparisons, look more to the Jamaicaway or Memorial Drive. (Where, as far as I know, there are few if any pedestrian overpasses or underpasses, but having them would be reasonable and safer.)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

davis_square: (Default)
The Davis Square Community

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
456 78 910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 11:24 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios