Miso Market building update
Sep. 6th, 2012 08:02 pmFollowup to http://davis-square.livejournal.com/2989159.html
I talked to a guy behind the counter tonight, and he said they have 3 years on their lease. The petition is to try to prevent shenanigans. I don't know what good it would do vs. having a good lawyer, but I approve of no landowner shenanigans so signed. He'd be happy -- I don't know his position -- with being paid to void the lease and go elsewhere, the ethical alternative to shenanigans, but thought that had been ruled out already. Building plan is 2-4 stories (he thought) of housing with businesses underneath, just as we all want. But now 3/4 of the site is empty, and will probably remain so for 3 years unless the owners can find some user who doesn't mind leaving in 3 years, thus I guess the fear of possible shenanigans, because the math is odd.
I wonder how much it would cost to get the spaces up to basic housing code. Lots of college students wouldn't mind a 3 year deadline.
I talked to a guy behind the counter tonight, and he said they have 3 years on their lease. The petition is to try to prevent shenanigans. I don't know what good it would do vs. having a good lawyer, but I approve of no landowner shenanigans so signed. He'd be happy -- I don't know his position -- with being paid to void the lease and go elsewhere, the ethical alternative to shenanigans, but thought that had been ruled out already. Building plan is 2-4 stories (he thought) of housing with businesses underneath, just as we all want. But now 3/4 of the site is empty, and will probably remain so for 3 years unless the owners can find some user who doesn't mind leaving in 3 years, thus I guess the fear of possible shenanigans, because the math is odd.
I wonder how much it would cost to get the spaces up to basic housing code. Lots of college students wouldn't mind a 3 year deadline.
no subject
Date: 2012-09-07 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-07 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-07 12:35 am (UTC)Also, occasionally big national companies set up temporary stores to get attention for particular products. That would be a nice draw to Porter Square.
no subject
Date: 2012-09-07 01:28 am (UTC)And this is only the retail space. Last year, I was technical director for the Boston Babydolls production of the Wrathskellar (playing this year at the Davis Sq Theater, behind Saloon), where we took over an empty store front and turned it into a 3 stage (4 performing space), audience in the round theater, playing for the month of October, gone by Nov 7th. And that space is within walking distance of both Davis and Porter.
None or all of which may or may not work for the space in question. The point is not that any of these will work for that space. The point is that there are seasonal options beyond just the standard Halloween store, and if someone has the endurance to deal with the never ending logistics and planning, then rolling over pop-up businesses can work for that space. All of which are better then letting empty space remain empty.
no subject
Date: 2012-09-07 01:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-07 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-07 08:48 pm (UTC)How could you? To get an occupancy permit for rental housing, every room needs to have a window, for one thing. That means you could get maybe two rooms, maybe three, out of the Bob Slate space if you did a ton of demo and put windows in the back and on the side, two rooms max out of the Stellabella space if you put windows at the back, and I doubt you could do anything with the Bookcellar space to bring it up to residential code.
The thing is, too, that empty commercial space is a tax writeoff, so it may be financially advantageous for whoever owns the space to let it sit empty than for them to invest tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of dollars in creating temporary residential housing.
no subject
Date: 2012-09-07 08:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-07 08:50 pm (UTC)From a community development standpoint, I agree 100%. It may not be the case from the owners' financial standpoint, though.
no subject
Date: 2012-09-10 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-10 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-10 09:40 pm (UTC)