Page Summary
ron_newman - (no subject)
sparr0.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pierceheart.livejournal.com - (no subject)
miss-chance.livejournal.com - (no subject)
miss-chance.livejournal.com - (no subject)
plumtreeblossom.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tober.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dougo.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sparr0.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ron_newman - (no subject)
ron_newman - (no subject)
mamajoan.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ron_newman - (no subject)
ron_newman - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Base style: Lefty by
- Theme: City Spring by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2012-09-07 02:41 pm (UTC)For Register of Deeds, Maryann Heuston got many more votes in Somerville (3467) than did Maria Curtatone (2216), but Maria Curtatone won the overall election.
no subject
Date: 2012-09-07 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-07 04:02 pm (UTC)That is, I'm saying it's not only a MA thing, so it's not like it's never done.
no subject
Date: 2012-09-07 09:52 pm (UTC)Do you know how we can see who all the write in votes were for? That would be fascinating.
no subject
Date: 2012-09-07 09:58 pm (UTC)Recording who-owns-what is a job that requires meticulous attention to detail, and absolute and utter uncorruptibility. I think now we have a lot of caution or cynicism about elected officials being as corruptible and vulnerable to influence as appointed ones, but back when the constitution was written, the ideals associated with democracy were mostly optimistic about the populous vs the power. At least this way, if you're going to bribe someone you have to be very careful about their opponent finding out, instead of just having to get one column of power under your influence.
no subject
Date: 2012-09-07 10:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-08 12:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-08 11:26 pm (UTC)2. Curtatone won with only 24% of the vote (http://www.boston.com/news/special/politics/2012/state-primary/middlesex-southern-register-of-deeds.html), in a 6-way race. I wonder if the results would have been different with preference voting (e.g. instant runoff).
no subject
Date: 2012-09-09 02:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-09 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-09 04:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-10 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-10 04:00 pm (UTC)But yeah, write-in votes aren't counted unless they are needed. This is why, if you write in the name of a candidate whose name is printed on the ballot, your vote is considered invalid: there is no guarantee that the vote will ever be counted.
no subject
Date: 2012-09-10 04:28 pm (UTC)