JonMon lawsuit
May. 8th, 2013 12:15 amI have offered my help to a couple of people involved and earlier this evening I attended a meeting with a few people. I thought I should make my offer public to anyone who is involved. Feel free to contact me. In particular, if you got one of those obnoxious letters offering to settle, I would be happy to write a response to his lawyer (where I think the response should go, because I suspect his lawyer is unaware of these letters and they are highly improper).
By the way, I am a lawyer.
By the way, I am a lawyer.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 04:20 am (UTC)Mostly, though, I think what we need is a headcount. As I can attest, because despite being named multiple times in the suit I have yet to receive a letter, Jonmon is extremely inconsistent with who he's sending these letters to.
So, check in, folks. If you got a letter, let us know here.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 04:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 04:40 am (UTC)And yes, thank you so very very much for stepping forward! I have been very concerned about Ron getting proper counsel.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 04:53 am (UTC)Dear Sir,
I am writing on behalf of a number of recipients of letters from your client concerning his lawsuit against Ron Newman and unnamed others (N.B. I do not represent Mr. Newman). A copy of several is enclosed [with the recipients name blacked out] so that you can get an idea of their tone and content. I understand that he has written many similar letters.
Some of the recipients were indeed posters to the livejournal threads referenced in the complaint; some were not. It does not matter. As you can see, these letters are highly improper; they are attempts to gain through intimidation and threats what he should be attempting to gain through the proper legal process (though I am highly doubtful of his chances for success). I am therefore confident that Mr. Monsarrat is doing this on his own without legal advice and without the knowledge of his counsel. And I thought it best to bring your client's actions to your attention. I trust that you will see to it that your client writes no more such letters.If Mr. Monsarrat has legitimate claims, he is free to bring them in court; only be certain that they will be met with a vigorous and comprehensive defense.
Sincerely, etc.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 05:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 05:17 am (UTC)One of the things I learned to appreciate from my mother, who was a lawyer and a law professor, was that when a crazy persons "threatens" legal action against you this is usually a blessing. You get a lawyer to go and be sane with their lawyer, and the whole thing is in the hands of professionals. And whenever they try to talk to you directly, you now have their lawyer to go to instead and you no longer have to deal with the crazy person. [It's no fun for your lawyer if the crazy person has found crazy council, but at least there's a ritualized framework for the interactions.]
I do hope that Monsarrat finds appropriate treatment before his damage drives him to violence against others or himself. In the mean time he's leaving a breadcrumb trail to the depths of his disorders. They might someday aid mental health professionals in helping him back from it.
If I get a mystery letter, I'll be sure to contact you. Thank you.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 05:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 07:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 08:46 am (UTC)(In its own way it is a blessing if the entire matter is handled legally. Not that this would happen, but, far worse if the perceived 'bullying' [via alleged defamation] were to be attempted to be resolved through some sort of vigilantism.)
I do hope
no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 09:50 am (UTC)Thanks you
no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 09:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 10:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 11:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 12:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 12:15 pm (UTC)If your fear gets the better of you, take
no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 12:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 01:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 01:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 01:22 pm (UTC)I am asking because it seems to me, also, that he's going after vulnerable people, and given what his character seems to me, it wouldn't surprise me at all if he puts women into the "vulnerable" category more so than men.
I suppose it's also possible that because of his previous conduct toward women, they tend to talk about him critically on-line more than men. Those of us men who are not creeps don't like creepy men any more than the women do, but there's no getting around the fact that there's a certain kind of creepy behavior that impacts women more, and more viscerally, than men. *sigh*
The answer to this question may be obvious to the folks who have hung out here for a long time. I'm not an active member of this community -- I've never lived in Somerville and just ended up here because I find JonMon's actions so appalling and want to keep following the story both because it is fascinating, in a can't-not-stare-at-the-car-accident sort of way, and in case there's something I can do to help.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 01:34 pm (UTC)Also, if it's a cell phone, you can take that to the police, the police can go to the carrier and BOOM! No cell phone.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-08 01:46 pm (UTC)If I had to guess, he's using a "background check" type website for his legwork that collects public records to find the names he doesn't recognize. Apparently a lot of his data comes from voter registration records and the like. A lot of them let you subscribe monthly for a flat fee. Considering that he's not hiring a constable or sending them registered mail...