![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
My awesome lawyer Dan Booth has just informed me that Jonathan Monsarrat's lawyer has filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice. This means that the case is OVER, against all defendants, named and unnamed, Doe and Buck alike. "With Prejudice" means that it can never be filed again, against any of us, for any statement in any of the exhibits that were attached to the complaint.
Johnny Monsarrat and his lawyer tried several times to reach a settlement agreement with Dan and me, but for various reasons we ended up rejecting each proposal. In the end, he has simply given up, without any mutual agreement, public or private.
Here's the official text of the notice:
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Pursuant to the provisions of Mass. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(i), the Plaintiff, Jonathan Graves Monsarrat, in the above-captioned matter, hereby files and gives notice of dismissal, with prejudice and without costs to either party, as to Deb Filcman, Ron Newman, the Doe Defendant identified as Doe Defendant "srakkt" in paragraph 51 of the Amended Complaint, whose real name is Richard James Scheffler of Somerville, Massachusetts, and John and Jane Does 1-99, as defendants in the Amended Complaint.
ETA: If Johnny had not voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit today, Dan Booth was ready to file this motion to dismiss and this supporting memorandum on Monday. (The supporting memo is the more interesting document.) It would be a shame for Dan to go to all that trouble and not be able to share his work, so I'm linking it here with his permission, for your legal edification.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-07 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-07 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-07 10:32 pm (UTC)(Ron et. al., I am glad that this is over for you.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-06-07 10:49 pm (UTC)(it didn't bother me, but I and others I know were actively wondering why they were, because the night was clear)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 08:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-09 06:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-06-07 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-09 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-07 11:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-07 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-07 11:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 12:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 12:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 01:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 11:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 06:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 07:02 pm (UTC)By the same token, however, you've got to own those mistakes and your part in them. I simply personally do not see that in attempting to sue 100 strangers because they have a low opinion of you.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 05:51 pm (UTC)It is my sincere hope that this follows Johnny Boy and haunts him for life, particularly when trying to attract investors in his future ventures.
Huzzah!
Date: 2013-06-09 03:09 am (UTC)Disposition of the defense fund was kind of touched-on in a subthread here, but I want to say that as a contributor -- and this is just me talking -- I feel that the maintainers can do what they want with it. As someone in that thread said, I think that show of support did send a message in itself, as to the resolve of this community to stand together and for each other. Maybe it didn't make a material difference to the outcome regards the plaintiff's side, but I do feel that it made a ton of difference on the defendants' side.
Again, this is just me, but when I make a donation to any kind of fund, as soon as I commit, it's out of my hands. I've already done my due diligence, and in donating, made a statement of trust.
In this case, I'm really, really glad that this might not even have gone to filing costs, let alone to actual, serious, billable hours. If the fund maintainers are going to turn over funds to the named defendants' counsel, I can certainly say that for my pittance at least, I'm totally fine with whatever those counsel do with it or advise to be done with it -- the entertainment and education provided by Booth's and Kleinsasser's letters, and Jay Wolman's advisories elsewhere, were well worth it.
And if they advise to turn it back to the donors ... well, I'd just say take those lawyers out to the Burren. Or for fro-yo. ;)
no subject
Date: 2013-06-10 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-11 01:39 pm (UTC)