It actually goes against property rights less than you might imagine. There's a legal notion of the "public trust doctrine", which is that certain resources have to be protected, even if they're privately owned. Usually this applies to waterways, seashores, lakes and the like. I've never heard of it applying to an individual true, though I suppose it wouldn't be entirely beyond the bounds of plausibility.
no subject
Date: 2014-01-24 08:03 pm (UTC)