[identity profile] bobobb.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] davis_square
After reading some of the recent posts here, I wanted to ask...

I moved to Davis Square area in 2005. It seemed to me that gentrification had already happened. Is that people's sense? Was I a gentrifier? Did it happen since then and I wasn't paying attention? I'm sort of perplexed it is coming up in discussions in the recent election because it seems like this happened a long time ago.

Appreciate you being patient with my ignorance. Welcome people's thought though.
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Date: 2015-09-15 10:31 am (UTC)
gingicat: deep purple lilacs, some buds, some open (just me - ginger)
From: [personal profile] gingicat
I feel that it kinda sorta started with Diesel Cafe, which was founded in 1999. This LJ community was founded in 2002.

Date: 2015-09-15 10:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] plumtreeblossom.livejournal.com
I moved to Davis in 1995, and I think the gentrification process was just getting started then. It was the era of Someday Cafe, and I honestly don't remember what else dominated the square then, but I remember the cheeky "Paris of the 90s" nickname that Davis somehow developed. When I first moved here, I shared a 2-bedroom apartment on Elmwood for only $700 (total; my half was just $350). Then rent control went away, and the landlord jacked the rent to an unthinkable $900 a month. Up until then, it felt like a cheap neighborhood for artsy people to live in, and I felt like I fit in.

I think by the time you moved here, the gentrification was already in mid-phase. The archives of this LJ community are actually full of history, and you can click back to 2005 and get a sense of the neighborhood vibe at the time.

Date: 2015-09-15 11:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gruene.livejournal.com
Definitely agree with "midphase". Gentrification is a process or a cycle of rising rents and changing businesses that feeds on itself. We certainly could have more gentrification than we've already had and end up like Belgravia in London or parts of Manhattan, with largely empty luxury boutiques and all the housing stock is owned by billionaires who mostly reside elsewhere. Fortunately Saudi princes are unlikely to want vinal sided triple deckers as vacation homes, but that's where this game ends.

http://jensorensen.com/2013/04/15/gentrification-cartoon/

Date: 2015-09-15 12:12 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] ron_newman
Or the Burren, which opened in 1996. Joshua Tree opened the following year. Before these, all of Elm Street from Day Street down to Russell was a pretty depressing and somewhat sleazy place, and certainly not a place to casually hang out at night.
Edited Date: 2015-09-15 12:13 pm (UTC)

Date: 2015-09-15 12:26 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] ron_newman
One could argue for December 1984, when the Red Line station opened.

Date: 2015-09-15 12:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] somerfriend.livejournal.com
So a sleazy place became safe-can we admit what most people actually think but don't say out loud, that gentrification is in many ways a good thing?

Date: 2015-09-15 12:35 pm (UTC)
desireearmfeldt: (Margaret Fuller)
From: [personal profile] desireearmfeldt
The Davis Square T station opened in 1985, which I've always taken to be the inciting event of gentrification -- but obviously that means I'm thinking of it as a pretty gradual process. I grew up in the Davis/Porter area, moved in shortly before work began on the Porter & Davis stations; moved back here myself in 1997, but was around even when I wasn't living in the neighborhood. Sadly, a kid's perspective is not great for this kind of question...

But my vague impression is that in the 1980s, Davis was dominated by people who had grown up in Somerville, but people like my parents (college-educated, white-collar, but not rolling in cash) were moving into the close-to-Cambridge parts of Somerville because it was cheaper, and the T stations facilitated that; by the 1990s when I was in/graduating from college, Davis had become the place where just-graduated college students went because it was a) easily on the Red Line, b) full of 4-bedroom rental apartments, and c) affordable on a starting white-collar salary, if you had roommates. When I was looking to buy a place, ~2003/4, all those 2- and 3- family houses that had been rental properties were being converted into condos. I'm not entirely clear if the developers thought they were marketing to my demographic again, i.e. the people who went to college in the Boston area, stayed and got high-paying white-collar jobs, had not yet had kids, and were 5-10 years out of school and looking to move from renting to buying, but not looking to migrate to the suburbs. I don't think we were the people who particularly wanted granite countertops and jacuzzis -- we mostly still wanted to walk to the T and be near the ex-college-student colony. Come to think of it, I don't know a huge number of people besides myself who bought those condos (and mine is not the granite-countertops-markup variety). Which suggests that there must have been an even-more-gentrified-than-me population moving in around that time?

Date: 2015-09-15 12:51 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] ron_newman
I wouldn't say that block was "unsafe" before, just not a place with much to recommend itself.

Gentrification can obviously bring benefits, but do we want to keep going indefinitely down the same road and end up as a denser Belmont?

Date: 2015-09-15 12:52 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] ron_newman
Somerville did not have rent control in the 1980s or 90s. Cambridge did, but that ended suddenly as a result of a state-wide referendum in 1994.

Edit: I added the history tag to this post. Those posts are worth looking through again. (Thank you [livejournal.com profile] plumtreeblossom for bringing the tagging system to this LJ community.)

Edit 2: Your mention of Someday Cafe prompted me to look up when it opened and closed: 1992 to 2006.
Edited Date: 2015-09-15 01:11 pm (UTC)

Date: 2015-09-15 01:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mindstalk.livejournal.com
I don't know what "a denser Belmont" would mean.

Date: 2015-09-15 01:29 pm (UTC)
alphacygni: (Default)
From: [personal profile] alphacygni
I believe that the 1997 naming of Davis Square as one of "The 15 Hippest Places to Live" by Utne Reader is often referenced as a sign. I remember it being talked about lots.

Date: 2015-09-15 01:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keithn.livejournal.com
But what about the quaint charm of the Winter Hill Gang? Didn't we all really move here to catch a glimpse of ol' Whitey working some deal-making magic with his shotgun? The yuppies, hispters, and techies have really ruined what made Somerville special. /s
Edited Date: 2015-09-15 01:36 pm (UTC)

Date: 2015-09-15 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] ron_newman
A place where most people are upper-middle-class to rich.

Date: 2015-09-15 01:37 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] ron_newman
Link to Utne Reader article. The part on Davis is short so I'll quote it in full here:
Out in Somerville, a blue-collar suburb of Boston awash in artistic-energy spillover from Cambridge, something is happening. Two of the 20 young writers in Granta’s fiction issue last year hail from here, and a lively cultural milieu has popped up around Davis Square. With its bookstores, Irish pubs, and adventuresome Somerville Theater, it's an alternative to franchise-filled Harvard Square.
Edited Date: 2015-09-15 01:37 pm (UTC)

Date: 2015-09-15 01:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vonelftinhaus.livejournal.com
I feel when the red line opened there was 5-10 years of "converting" going on and of course that time frame is not exact - but I'm sure you will all agree nothing happens over night. I moved to the Davis area in the summer of 1995 and like plumtreeblossom had a 3 bedroom ( maybe actually a 2 1/2 bed as one room was much smaller) for $820 a month - that same layout now which has obviously been upgraded goes for $3400 a month. I wanted to point out also certain actions taken by the city or businesses themselves I am sure help with "cleaning up" an area and do not always have gentrifying as there main goal, or at least I hope these are done because it's the right thing to do, as years back the Somerville theatre power washed the exterior of the building which was a huge improvement from the dark appearance it has before. Also they eventually upgraded the entire building added those additional movies screens.

Date: 2015-09-15 02:05 pm (UTC)
cos: (frff-profile)
From: [personal profile] cos
I'm pretty sure the really big wave of it began when Massachusetts voted to end rent control in a statewide referendum in 1994. Cambridge (where voters where overwhelmingly in favor of keeping rent control) was one of the very few places in the state that actually had it, and 1995 was the first year without rent control in Cambridge since the 1960s. Rents shot up dramatically for several years in a row, and a wave of Cambridge residents moved into much-cheaper Somerville, particularly the parts of Somerville near Cambridge. Rents in west Somerville followed and increased dramatically in the next few years, too. Eventually things settled down and became a bit more stable, but it took several years. So, 1995-1999 were the years when this change was happening rapidly.

Date: 2015-09-15 02:09 pm (UTC)
cos: (frff-profile)
From: [personal profile] cos
See my comment below. I think you're right, 1995 was the first year of a massive wave of it, driven by the 1994 statewide referendum to end rent control in Cambridge and Boston.

Date: 2015-09-15 02:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] turil.livejournal.com
I remember starting to look at apartments in Somerville, in addition to the places I'd always looked over in JP, in the early 90's, so at least back then it was somewhat "hip" with the young, semi-affluent and/or artsy crowd (I went to MassArt). I met a few people who lived in the Porter Square area (and dated a guy who lived right around there somewhere for a bit), and went to a party (via another MassArt friend) over on Broadway by Tufts back in 92-ish, I think. So things were definitely not totally old school even at that time. But certainly young creative types have taken over far more, over time.

Date: 2015-09-15 02:13 pm (UTC)
desireearmfeldt: (Margaret Fuller)
From: [personal profile] desireearmfeldt
So here's a possibly interesting question: you're talking in terms of rent control changes affecting the differential between renting in Cambridge and renting in Somerville; but when my parents moved to Somerville (15 years before the period you're talking about) it was because *owning* in Somerville was cheaper than owning in Cambridge. I wonder how those two aspects of the housing market interacted with each other.

(And then there's the more recent conversion of a lot of rental apartments into condos, which I have to assume has pushed the remaining rents up still further, and probably shifted the population of residents towards somewhat older and richer demographics, i.e. buyers rather than renters, but youngish buyers.)

Date: 2015-09-15 02:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] turil.livejournal.com
Yeah, I first moved to the Davis Square area (initially right in Davis at a horrible place right on Cutter Ave) in '97 and I think we were paying $250 a month per person (that first place was a two bedroom with a living room and kitchen as well, and the second place up in Teele was, I think $1000 total for a large 4 bedroom with a big living room and dining room and kitchen).

Date: 2015-09-15 02:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chenoameg.livejournal.com
Well, the very very beginning was when the T stop went into Davis Square, but it took a while.

I think it really started in the late 90s (so yes, I am also to blame).

But now it is getting to that every home sale in the area is to turn into luxury condos, and the number of "good enough" apartments that don't have granite and stainless steel and also might have semi-affordable rent is dwindling even faster. At least that's my perspective from over near Lexington Park.


Date: 2015-09-15 02:17 pm (UTC)
cos: (frff-profile)
From: [personal profile] cos
Very closely related. If you can get higher rents, that makes the value of a house higher, so rising rents increase house prices. From the other direction, people who already own and have tenants charge a rent that covers their mortgage + some extra, so the floor on how low their rent can go is based on how expensive the house was when they bought it, unless they've had it for decades and it's all paid off. Which also means, the more people are buying houses recently, the more rents have to go up to cover current mortgages. And of course if rents shoot up in Cambridge and bring property values up on that side of the line, it pushes more potential home buyers into Somerville. So, same effect.

Date: 2015-09-15 02:31 pm (UTC)
totient: (default)
From: [personal profile] totient
Generally rents are a leading indicator for housing prices.

Date: 2015-09-15 02:42 pm (UTC)
totient: (default)
From: [personal profile] totient
The first apartment I rented in what's now considered the Davis Square area, in 1991, was $1000 for a fairly ample 3-bed just outside Ball Square with 4 of us living in it. We also looked at a 5-bed on a busy street a few blocks from the Davis T that would have been $1200 but decided we didn't want to take on an extra housemate.

I was living just over the Cambridge line when rent control was defeated. Our rent for a 3-1/2 bedroom (but a small one, so about the size of the Ball Square apartment) went from $850 to $1000 immediately and to $1600 within a year.

There have been a few really crazy periods of house price inflation. You know the kind, where sellers research what their house is worth and list it for a little higher than that but not too much higher because they don't want it to be unseemly, but in the meantime housing prices have gone up so much that all the offers are for more than asking. When we were buying in 1997 we walked into a well-kept 2-family in a great location that was listed for $370K, immediately knew that we couldn't afford it, offered what we could afford which was $390K, and didn't get it. I think of that summer as when the housing prices caught up with the rental prices. Of course that's happening again now, as rents have redoubled since then, with most of that coming in the last couple of years.

All that said, I think of gentrification as a wave that's been spreading outward from the T, with some pauses for recessions, almost since it opened, starting with the construction of what's now the Harvard Vanguard Medical building.
Edited Date: 2015-09-15 02:55 pm (UTC)

Date: 2015-09-15 03:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] smoterh.livejournal.com
Isn't bourgeois just the worst?
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Profile

davis_square: (Default)
The Davis Square Community

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
456 78 910
11121314151617
181920212223 24
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 31st, 2026 04:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios