Help Identifying My Flowers?
Aug. 21st, 2007 06:23 pmThis summer I've been making a beginner's effort at growing wildflowers from seed in my tiny front yard. We used to have the ugliest yard on the street, but the rugged little wildflowers are improving it. I put down a Northeastern seed mixture that I bought online of about 30 different wildflower species, and so far 6 varieties have bloomed. I've been able to identify all of them except this one:

Does anyone know what it is? This individual one is silver dollar sized, but there are others of it's kind that are smaller, or less ornate with the red. They're on fuzzy, sturdy stalks, and grow low to the ground. It's lovely, but I've found nothing online to match it up to.
Thanks for any help!
Does anyone know what it is? This individual one is silver dollar sized, but there are others of it's kind that are smaller, or less ornate with the red. They're on fuzzy, sturdy stalks, and grow low to the ground. It's lovely, but I've found nothing online to match it up to.
Thanks for any help!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 10:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 11:22 pm (UTC)A common type of Rudbeckia is called Black-eyed Susan...
no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 11:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 11:40 pm (UTC)Also, many wildflowers won't bloom their first year when grown from seed. (echinacea, for example won't flower from seed unless it's started *really* early. I started some this year, and just now they've only started getting full-sized leaves. They'll start dying back for the winter soon enough.)
As far as maintaining the wildflowers, when everything dries up, make sure to rescatter the seeds! I made the mistake once of cutting a wildflower garden down, and then raking it all up, instead of just leaving the cuttings on the ground. We had to reseed it the next year :/
no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 11:41 pm (UTC)Dracopis amplexicaulis
Date: 2007-08-22 01:09 am (UTC)Anyway, I'm pretty sure your specimen is a Dracopis amplexicaulis, or "Clasping Coneflower" which is a native wildflower, related to Rudbeckia (in fact sometimes called Rudbeckia amplexicaulis), and will in fact grow from seed in the first year. If you have other photos that would help in the identification.
Meanwhile, I second the suggestion that you harvest seed and scatter it yourself-- although I let my "dead" stalks stand until spring because they provide a good food source for a number of native birds (particularly goldfinches and chickadees).
And if you want a great resource for seeds, for information (great experts and really helpful), for buying plants, etc. check out the New England Wildflower Society (http://newfs.org/). It is a great place to go and visit -- Garden in the Woods!-- in any season whether you are new to native plant conservation or an "old-timer." And they also have very good classes - such as "how to propagate wildflowers" -- I've taken a few.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 02:45 am (UTC)http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/930/687997.JPG
http://www.co.st-louis.mo.us/parks/photos/cg-photos/anemoneblanda.jpg
http://www.grooms-flowers.co.uk/product_images/150_6_1_1.gif
Re: Dracopis amplexicaulis
Date: 2007-08-22 02:58 pm (UTC)And yeah, leaving them up over winter is a great idea, especially if the stalks are strong enough to withstand the winter itself... I'm usually only used to leaving things like ornamental grasses and sedums up for the winter.
I never would've thought of Dracopis, although I did look at it when trying to answer... the Wikipedia merely has a b+w line-drawn sketch of it, and it doesn't resemble certain details of the plant much!
BTW, according to USDA (http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=DRAM), Dracopis isn't native to this area, but it's native to North America. Apparently it's a weed in the south. Let's hope it doesn't become a pest up here! I hate dealing with invasives.
Re: Dracopis amplexicaulis
Date: 2007-08-22 04:31 pm (UTC)Yes, I am like-minded in showing caution about what is a "native" -- especially as I spend hours of volunteer time trying to remove nasty invasives like glossy buckthorn, purple loosestrife and garlic mustard from native habitats! Still I think some species, depending on their history, integration and habitat value is acceptable. For example, all that "native" bluestem grass that's really only native to mid-west prairies as of say 200 years ago, but is now found regularly in New England in former pasture/farm land. It has integrated successfully and all types of birds and insects etc. rely on it, while it doesn't out compete anything else. A tougher question would be something like the Black Locust tree, listed as an invasive in some states of New England even though it's native to the Southeast/Midatlantic. I haven't made up my own mind on that debate, have you?
And yes, I wax rhapsodic about Garden In The Woods-- such a wonderful place-- and I have yet to get to Nasami Farm but it is on my to-do list! :)
Re: Dracopis amplexicaulis
Date: 2007-08-22 05:05 pm (UTC)Re: Dracopis amplexicaulis
Date: 2007-08-22 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 01:17 pm (UTC)Re: Dracopis amplexicaulis
Date: 2007-08-23 03:45 pm (UTC)Coreopsis tinctoria (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coreopsis_tinctoria)