Privacy for naked drunkards
Dec. 12th, 2007 12:32 pmFollowing the discussion about Google Streetview vs. privacy, some may be interested in the haha brouing over at the Villeside Journal site. One of the intrepid reporters took a video camera to the Tufts Naked Quad Run and posted it on Youtube. Drunk streakers were not amused.
http://www.wickedlocal.com/somerville/fun/x805327507
http://www.wickedlocal.com/somerville/fun/x805327507
no subject
Date: 2007-12-12 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-12 11:45 pm (UTC)Seriously dood.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-13 12:56 pm (UTC)Claiming that I am 'rabidly defending' voyeurs is another straw man. I have said nothing to defend the photographers at the event. Though I have noted that there are no rights to privacy granted to participants of a clearly public event, I also granted that the photographers may, in fact, be predatory. Further, I am comfortable saying that knowing full well that most of the cameras were handled by fellow Tufties and in some cases by the participants themselves.
But all of this is beside the point. Again, the participants went into the event with full knowledge that there was a risk of photographers being present. That risk was demonstrable through photographic evidence from past NQRs. If the assumption was that somehow things would magically change and there would be no pictures taken, the participants making this assumption were being naive and did not adequately consider the consequences of their actions. It's quite simple, really... If you do not want to be photographed naked at a public event, do not appear naked at that public event.