My Opinion

[neitherday.livejournal.com]

As moderator, I do agree non-worksafe material should be <lj-cut>. However, I do not believe this post is non-worksafe. All the "inappropriate" bits are covered up. I've seen nudity (barring certain specific areas of the body) in magazines in waiting rooms in offices so many times, that I don't see a problem with dykeprincess's post.

Comments

image placeholders

[enmascarado.livejournal.com]

As a general public service note, if you go to your edit info page, you can check to have images replaced with image placeholders, so they won't show up in your friends page. I do this mainly because some people on my friends page have taken to posting many photos with their updates which kills my dial-up at home. A nice side effect: if someone posts a picture that I shouldn't be seeing at work, I don't see it. I didn't see the picture in dykeprincess's post or even know there was a controversy about it until this post.

And if you do decide you want to see the image someone posted, you can click on the place holder, or a read/post comment link.

If you're particularly nervous about what you view at work, this might be the option for you.

-Dan

Re: image placeholders

[on-reserve.livejournal.com]

Fine advice on how individuals can take responsibility/ownership for what they view online while at work (a.k.a while not working/goofing off) instead of blaming other for what they see :)

Re: image placeholders

[enmascarado.livejournal.com]

I don't necessarily disagree with the others, I just understand the path of least resistance.

Also, I'm surfing at work now, but I'm not goofing off, I just have down time. My office doesn't have the "be busy or look busy" philosophy. That might be the case with others.

-Dan