My Opinion
Apr. 12th, 2004 07:16 pmAs moderator, I do agree non-worksafe material should be <lj-cut>. However, I do not believe this post is non-worksafe. All the "inappropriate" bits are covered up. I've seen nudity (barring certain specific areas of the body) in magazines in waiting rooms in offices so many times, that I don't see a problem with
dykeprincess's post.
Re: i think your logic is skewed
Date: 2004-04-13 12:36 pm (UTC)And for those who want a pixel number, pictures greater than 500 pixels wide need to be cut.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 01:12 pm (UTC)The issue is that the words "clearly" and "worksafe" are individually defined. Some people have different notions of what "clearly" means, and some workplaces are different from others. I work from home, for example, and very seldom have anybody looking over my shoulder. Some of the projects I work on ("worksafe", by definition) would not be suitable for this community. In a community, we need to have a shared notion of what's acceptable.
pictures greater than 500 pixels wide need to be cut.
Unless your screen is much smaller than mine, I think that was a typo. Make it "500 pixels high" and I'd be happy with it.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 03:40 pm (UTC)And 500 pixels wide wasn't a typo. A lot of people operate on a screen that's 640 pixels wide or less. The idea is to prevent horizontal scrolling.