Local family-planning oriented doctor?
Apr. 6th, 2008 04:07 pmWell, my partner and I have decided to take the plunge and try to get pregnant. We're very excited! However, even though my Harvard Vanguard doctor can currently take care of my, ahem, "reproductive needs," I really don't like her much at all. I want to find someone before we begin who really knows his/her stuff, and who has a great bedside manner and can tolerate my reserved nature and my mild fear of all things medical. Has anybody had any great experiences? Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 09:09 pm (UTC)If the first, I highly recommend the midwife practice at Mt. Auburn. They are amazing. www.mamah.org
Good luck!
no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 10:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 10:02 pm (UTC)I had mostly a very good experience with the midwives at the Cambridge Birth Center. The prenatal care was very good, very caring, the staff is really warm and friendly, IME.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 10:29 pm (UTC)I was with the Cambridge Birth Center folks myself, and I liked them. (Specifically, I had my appointments with Christley Harris, who is one of those seasoned and motherly types who knows everything (obviously I liked her). I sort of lost count of everyone I saw during labor -- you get whoever's on shift.) I looooooved their birth rooms, which unfortunately I did not get to use, because I ended up having a c-section across the street ;). I feel sort of enh about the Cambridge hospital (L&D nurses were *awesome*, maternity not so much, the obstetrician was fine, the anesthesiologist was a bitch). It is important to keep in mind, though, that even if you are with midwives you may end up in the hospital, so research the associated hospital as well (and ask how many of their patients end up in the hospital rather than the birth center), if that's something you want to avoid.
I have also never heard anyone speak badly of the Taking Charge of your Fertility book, but I wouldn't go so far as to call it a "must read" (because I didn't, lol). It seems like it's crucial to read it if you try for a while and have no luck, and a lot of people I know have found it very interesting to learn in detail how their bodies work, but it's not like you have to read it or chart your cycles or any of that unless you are having difficulty conceiving.
Anyway, good luck and have fun!
no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 10:34 pm (UTC)He's also big on women's options and reproductive rights. After my first child is born, he's willing to do a tubal ligation. It's my body, my choice. Most OB's won't go near that one.
Hopefully that gives you an idea of him. PM me if you'd like his number.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 11:48 pm (UTC)For me, TCOYF was a must-read because I was pretty ignorant about my body. It was amazing to me how much I just didn't know. :) I was on the pill forever, and when I went off it and started charting, it was incredible to me to get to understand how my body worked. You certainly don't have to chart, but even people without fertility problems have cycles that differ from the standard opinion of "you ovulate on Day 14" myth that's out there, and it's very useful to know the signs. I didn't actually chart for my 2nd, 3rd (miscarriage) or 4th pregnancy (I'm at 31 weeks now), just watched the obvious signs, and had no trouble getting pregnant. It's different for everyone though!
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 01:38 am (UTC)Good luck!
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 02:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 04:52 pm (UTC)I'll also echo what's been said below about considering where you want to deliver along with whom you want to see. We found Mt. Auburn to be MUCH more relaxing and homey (there are about a dozen post delivery rooms) than the big birthing centers (MGH, B&W) where our friends have delivered amongst floors and floors of babies. Great experienced, relaxed nurses for whom you're not one of a teeming mass, but also the ability to intervene in pretty sophisticated ways should that become necessary.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 12:07 pm (UTC)