Shaw's parking lot
Apr. 16th, 2008 02:44 pmI walked through the parking lot by Shaw's in Porter Square today, and I saw cars being towed from the lot by Phil's Towing. A couple of hours later, I walked back through the lot, and I saw security people marking car tires with chalk. It looks like the two-hour parking limit is being strictly enforced now.
Also, I noticed that the parking lines have been repainted so that there are no longer any compact car spaces. All of the spaces are now for standard-sized cars.
Also, I noticed that the parking lines have been repainted so that there are no longer any compact car spaces. All of the spaces are now for standard-sized cars.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 06:59 pm (UTC)Because those with ginormous SUVs blatantly ignored the "Compact Cars" bit and squeezed themselves in so other cars didn't really fit on either side, necessitating people squeezing out through tiny openings of the car doors. So why bother having them if people ignore them?
Good to know about the towing, though.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 07:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 07:00 pm (UTC)they're probably also more strictly enforcing the employee parking thing as well. a few months ago i wasn't paying attention and parked there, they slapped a HUGE "VIOLATION" sticker on my windshield that would *not* come off. had to scrape at the thing for hours with all sorts of chemicals to remove it. obviously that was my fault :P but it was new to me.
now that the porter exchange mall has cracked down on parking there too, it's harder for people to sneak free parking in the area. aww, poor babies ;D
no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 07:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Restriping & time limit
Date: 2008-04-16 07:32 pm (UTC)The restriping to create compact car spots dates to the renovation and solar power assist upgrade that was done about six or seven years ago. The idea was to create more spaces, and since it's an urban location, the presumption was, and the reality is, that most of the cars in the lot are compact or mid-sized. Unfortunately, human behavior being what it is, the full size spaces all got occupied first, because who wants to a) shoehorn themselves into a narrow space when they don't have to, and b) risk door dings from the clod next to you even if you're both compacts in the center of your lines? This left narrow spaces for everyone who came later, SUV drivers and all, and damage complaints skyrocketed. One of the reasons tire chalking goes by the board is the the lot security officers are dealing with irate patrons with door dings, fender scrapes, and broken taillights.
I learned this when it happened to me. Cost to replace the broken outer plexiglass of my right rear light is just below my deductible. Did the perp leave me his info, or even a twenty to apologize? Nope. The security guy showed me the sheaf of complaints already in hand for just that week, and said that he saw many folks curse, scream, stomp, and then pull away without coming to him to make a report or complain.
Hope the perspective helps y'all be a bit philosophical about it. This too shall pass.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 07:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 10:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 08:29 pm (UTC)Some of the spots were marked compact, but I observed that was more for length than width. To fan the flames, they have now taken more spots away and marked theme employee only.
As far as I'm concerned, you either have to be able to handle the level of vehicles expected, or don't handle them at all. This would have necessitated building a parking garage (more construction $) or providing no parking and relying on walking/bike customers only (less revenue $).
The whole Porter Exchange, in my opinion, relies on this half-arsed approach, where they shoe horn in some spots, but not enough, leading to perpetual overcrowding of the lot. This isn't just a problem for the people who shop there. The congestion spills over onto Mass. Ave. and the neighbouring streets, creating hazards for other motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians. Navigating through Porter Sq. is a nightmare.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-17 12:39 am (UTC)There's Porter Sq. Urban Planning?!?
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 08:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 09:10 pm (UTC)I had one of those carts; bought it in 1992 or so? It lasted me through Boston, Raleigh, Atlanta and Toronto. It finally fell apart there in 2004 (usable but took some fighting), but sadly, the Tags tag had fallen off sometime after Atlanta. I seriously thought of bringing it with me when I moved back here in 2006, and if it had had the tag still, I would've, for the amusement of it. But it lasted a long while, regardless of the guarantee.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 09:52 pm (UTC)* Since cargo trailers are somewhat of a specialty item here they aren't made in great quantity. But an inexpensive child carrier trailer (which can be gotten new for less than $100 because there are a few models built in quantity) will work too and has the benefit of full weather protection.
(no subject)
From:cargo bikes
From:Re: cargo bikes
From:Re: cargo bikes
From:Re: cargo bikes
From:Re: cargo bikes
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 10:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 08:49 pm (UTC)Bad: This is because there will never be any more parking spaces available there ever again.
Hmmm, tossup.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 09:21 pm (UTC)PS. I like that LJ suggests Smelly and Smellier and Scurvily as correct spellings for "Somerville".
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-17 02:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-17 03:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-17 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-17 05:51 pm (UTC)1) free
2) stress-free
4) much less of a hassle
5) time limit-less
Shhhh....don't tell too many folks about this parking oasis.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-17 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-18 05:21 pm (UTC)And FYI to Ron.....a one-way street is technically one-way for everyone. It's not one-way for cars and two-way for bikes. Travelling down a one-way street the wrong way is not only tempting an accident with a car, but it's a GREAT way to have an accident involving a pedestrian, many of whom only look for traffic one-way on a one-way street!
And please, Mr. McFeely, DO NOT park in the Kennedy School lot during school hours (should be obvious, I know, but really isn't!).